}

    /**
     * Safe integer multiplication with overflow check
     *
     * @param a first operand
     * @param b second operand
     * @return product of a and b
     * @throws ArithmeticException if overflow occurs
     */
    public static int safeMultiply(int a, int b) {
        validateIntegerMultiplication(a, b, "Multiplication");
        return a * b;
    }

    /**

                    int safeShift = Math.min(MAX_BACKOFF_SHIFT, Math.max(0, retryCount - 1));
                    long multiplier = 1L << safeShift;
                    // Check for potential overflow before multiplication
                    long delay = (retryDelayMs > Long.MAX_VALUE / multiplier) ? MAX_RETRY_DELAY
                            : Math.min(MAX_RETRY_DELAY, retryDelayMs * multiplier);
                    Thread.sleep(delay);

      if (x.length() != (originalString.length() * count)) {
        throw new RuntimeException("Wrong length: " + x);
      }
    }
  }

  private static String oldRepeat(String string, int count) {
    // If this multiplication overflows, a NegativeArraySizeException or
    // OutOfMemoryError is not far behind
    int len = string.length();
    int size = len * count;
    char[] array = new char[size];
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i += len) {

      if (x.length() != (originalString.length() * count)) {
        throw new RuntimeException("Wrong length: " + x);
      }
    }
  }

  private static String oldRepeat(String string, int count) {
    // If this multiplication overflows, a NegativeArraySizeException or
    // OutOfMemoryError is not far behind
    int len = string.length();
    int size = len * count;
    char[] array = new char[size];
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i += len) {

      long result = 1;
      for (int i = n1 + 1; i <= n2; i++) {
        result *= i;
      }
      return BigInteger.valueOf(result);
    }

    /*
     * We want each multiplication to have both sides with approximately the same number of digits.
     * Currently, we just divide the range in half.
     */
    int mid = (n1 + n2) >>> 1;

      return true;
    }
  },
  /**
   * This strategy uses all 128 bits of {@link Hashing#murmur3_128} when hashing. It looks different
   * from the implementation in MURMUR128_MITZ_32 because we're avoiding the multiplication in the
   * loop and doing a (much simpler) += hash2. We're also changing the index to a positive number by
   * AND'ing with Long.MAX_VALUE instead of flipping the bits.
   */
  MURMUR128_MITZ_64() {
    @Override

        assertThrows(ArithmeticException.class, () -> InputValidator.safeAdd(Integer.MIN_VALUE, -1));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test safe integer multiplication")
    void testSafeMultiplication() {
        assertEquals(100, InputValidator.safeMultiply(10, 10));
        assertEquals(-100, InputValidator.safeMultiply(10, -10));

    assertEquals(1, future.get(-1, SECONDS).intValue());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testOverflowTimeout() throws Exception {
    // First, sanity check that naive multiplication would really overflow to a negative number:
    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);
    assertThat(nanosPerSecond * Long.MAX_VALUE).isLessThan(0L);

    assertEquals(1, future.get(-1, SECONDS).intValue());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testOverflowTimeout() throws Exception {
    // First, sanity check that naive multiplication would really overflow to a negative number:
    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);
    assertThat(nanosPerSecond * Long.MAX_VALUE).isLessThan(0L);

        if (result > Integer.MAX_VALUE || result < Integer.MIN_VALUE) {
            failedValidations.incrementAndGet();
            integerOverflowsPrevented.incrementAndGet();
            log.warn("Integer overflow in multiplication: {} * {} = {}", a, b, result);
            throw new SmbException("Integer overflow detected");
        }
        return (int) result;
    }

    /**
     * Validate SMB message size
     *