* annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which

# Testing Dependencies with Overrides

## Overriding dependencies during testing

There are some scenarios where you might want to override a dependency during testing.

You don't want the original dependency to run (nor any of the sub-dependencies it might have).

Or it might be the case that you just prefer to take other courses because they adapt better to your learning style.

### Suggest solutions

* After being able to understand the question, you can give them a possible **answer**.

* In many cases, it's better to understand their **underlying problem or use case**, because there might be a better way to solve it than what they are trying to do.

    }
    assertNull(
        "The array element immediately following the end of the collection should be nulled",
        array[getNumElements()]);
    // array[getNumElements() + 1] might or might not have been nulled
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(KNOWN_ORDER)
  public void testToArray_oversizedArray_ordered() {
    E[] array = getSubjectGenerator().createArray(getNumElements() + 2);

   * be declared as a {@code List}.
   *
   * <p>Note also that serialization is not in general required to return an object that is
   * {@linkplain Object#equals equal} to the original, nor is it required to return even an object
   * of the same class. For example, if sublists of {@code MyList} instances were serializable,

		t.Errorf("%s: Expected IsTruncated to be `false`, but instead found it to be `%v`", instanceType, result.IsTruncated)
	}

	uploadContent := "The specified multipart upload does not exist. The upload ID might be invalid, or the multipart upload might have been aborted or completed."
	var opts ObjectOptions
	// check before paging occurs.
	for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
		key := "obj" + strconv.Itoa(i)

	"time"
)

// Supported amz date formats.
var amzDateFormats = []string{
	// Do not change this order, x-amz-date format is usually in
	// iso8601Format rest are meant for relaxed handling of other
	// odd SDKs that might be out there.
	"20060102T150405Z",
	time.RFC1123,
	time.RFC1123Z,
	// Add new AMZ date formats here.
}

// ErrMalformedDate always returned for dates that cannot be parsed.

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial011_an_py39.py hl[22] *}

/// tip

All this might seem contrived. And it might not be very clear how is it useful yet.

These examples are intentionally simple, but show how it all works.

In the chapters about security, there are utility functions that are implemented in this same way.

/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion