* final} constants.
 *
 * <p>The {@link Joiner} class provides the inverse operation to splitting, but note that a
 * round-trip between the two should be assumed to be lossy.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/StringsExplained#splitter">{@code Splitter}</a>.
 *
 * @author Julien Silland
 * @author Jesse Wilson

 * final} constants.
 *
 * <p>The {@link Joiner} class provides the inverse operation to splitting, but note that a
 * round-trip between the two should be assumed to be lossy.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/StringsExplained#splitter">{@code Splitter}</a>.
 *
 * @author Julien Silland
 * @author Jesse Wilson

 * converter.reverse().convert(converter.convert(a)).equals(a)} is always true). However, it is very
 * common (perhaps <i>more</i> common) for round-trip conversion to be <i>lossy</i>. Consider an
 * example round-trip using {@link com.google.common.primitives.Doubles#stringConverter}:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>{@code stringConverter().convert("1.00")} returns the {@code Double} value {@code 1.0}

 * converter.reverse().convert(converter.convert(a)).equals(a)} is always true). However, it is very
 * common (perhaps <i>more</i> common) for round-trip conversion to be <i>lossy</i>. Consider an
 * example round-trip using {@link com.google.common.primitives.Doubles#stringConverter}:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>{@code stringConverter().convert("1.00")} returns the {@code Double} value {@code 1.0}

	if !is64Bit {
		return
	}

	runTestCases("64-bit", []testCase{
		0: {"-", maxInt, "out of range"},
	})
}

type RunesTest struct {
	in    string
	out   []rune
	lossy bool
}

var RunesTests = []RunesTest{
	{"", []rune{}, false},
	{" ", []rune{32}, false},
	{"ABC", []rune{65, 66, 67}, false},
	{"abc", []rune{97, 98, 99}, false},

    this.max = max;
  }

  /**
   * Returns statistics over a dataset containing the given values.
   *
   * @param values a series of values, which will be converted to {@code double} values (this may
   *     cause loss of precision)
   */
  public static Stats of(Iterable<? extends Number> values) {
    StatsAccumulator accumulator = new StatsAccumulator();
    accumulator.addAll(values);
    return accumulator.snapshot();
  }

 */
public enum HandleType {
    /**
     * No durability - standard handle
     */
    NONE(0),

    /**
     * SMB 2.1 durable handle - survives network loss
     */
    DURABLE_V1(1),

    /**
     * SMB 3.0 durable handle V2 - with timeout configuration
     */
    DURABLE_V2(2),

    /**
     * SMB 3.0 persistent handle - survives server reboot
     */

HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS

    // The upper bound on the length of an array and the bounds on the int values mean that, in
    // this case only, we can compute the sum as a long without risking overflow or loss of
    // precision. So we do that, as it's slightly quicker than the Knuth algorithm.
    long sum = 0;
    for (int index = 0; index < values.length; ++index) {
      sum += values[index];
    }

HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS