* IllegalStateException} if it is accessed in any way, with the following exceptions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code view.equals(view)} evaluates to {@code true} (but any other {@code equals()}
   *       expression involving {@code view} will throw)
   *   <li>{@code hashCode()} does not throw
   *   <li>if {@code node} is re-added to the network after having been removed, {@code view}'s
   *       behavior is undefined
   * </ul>
   *

   * IllegalStateException} if it is accessed in any way, with the following exceptions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code view.equals(view)} evaluates to {@code true} (but any other {@code equals()}
   *       expression involving {@code view} will throw)
   *   <li>{@code hashCode()} does not throw
   *   <li>if {@code node} is re-added to the network after having been removed, {@code view}'s
   *       behavior is undefined
   * </ul>
   *

   * IllegalStateException} if it is accessed in any way, with the following exceptions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code view.equals(view)} evaluates to {@code true} (but any other {@code equals()}
   *       expression involving {@code view} will throw)
   *   <li>{@code hashCode()} does not throw
   *   <li>if {@code node} is re-added to the graph after having been removed, {@code view}'s
   *       behavior is undefined
   * </ul>
   *

   * IllegalStateException} if it is accessed in any way, with the following exceptions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code view.equals(view)} evaluates to {@code true} (but any other {@code equals()}
   *       expression involving {@code view} will throw)
   *   <li>{@code hashCode()} does not throw
   *   <li>if {@code node} is re-added to the graph after having been removed, {@code view}'s
   *       behavior is undefined
   * </ul>
   *

   * IllegalStateException} if it is accessed in any way, with the following exceptions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code view.equals(view)} evaluates to {@code true} (but any other {@code equals()}
   *       expression involving {@code view} will throw)
   *   <li>{@code hashCode()} does not throw
   *   <li>if {@code node} is re-added to the graph after having been removed, {@code view}'s
   *       behavior is undefined
   * </ul>
   *

                new ManagedDependencyContextRefiner(getScopeManager()));
    }

    /**
     * This method produces "surrogate" type registry that is static: it aims users that want to use
     * Maven-Resolver without involving Maven Core and related things.
     * <p>
     * This type registry is NOT used by Maven Core: Maven replaces it during Session creation with a type registry
     * that supports extending it (i.e. via Maven Extensions).

        b.addDependency("a", "1.0");
        assertThrows(
                CyclicDependencyException.class,
                () -> collect(a),
                "Should have failed on cyclic dependency not involving project");
    }

    @Test
    @Disabled("works, but we don't fail on cycles presently")
    void testCircularDependencyIncludingCurrentProject()

   * @param newValue the argument from a user update call
   * @return result of the update function
   */
  abstract long fn(long currentValue, long newValue);

  /**
   * Handles cases of updates involving initialization, resizing, creating new Cells, and/or
   * contention. See above for explanation. This method suffers the usual non-modularity problems of
   * optimistic retry code, relying on rechecked sets of reads.
   *

   * <p>Note about generics: The signature {@code public T or(T defaultValue)} is overly
   * restrictive. However, the ideal signature, {@code public <S super T> S or(S)}, is not legal
   * Java. As a result, some sensible operations involving subtypes are compile errors:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * Optional<Integer> optionalInt = getSomeOptionalInt();
   * Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // error
   *

   * @param newValue the argument from a user update call
   * @return result of the update function
   */
  abstract long fn(long currentValue, long newValue);

  /**
   * Handles cases of updates involving initialization, resizing, creating new Cells, and/or
   * contention. See above for explanation. This method suffers the usual non-modularity problems of
   * optimistic retry code, relying on rechecked sets of reads.
   *