}

    assertThat(buffer.readByteString()).isEqualTo("A20743054A6F6E6573".decodeHex())
  }

  @Test fun `decode implicit tagged implicit prefixed type`() {
    // Type1 ::= VisibleString
    // Type2 ::= [APPLICATION 3] IMPLICIT Type1
    // Type3 ::= [2] Type2
    // Type4 ::= [APPLICATION 7] IMPLICIT Type3
    val buffer =
      Buffer()
        .write("670743054A6F6E6573".decodeHex())

  // Double#doubleToRawLongBits(double)} spec.
  static final long SIGN_MASK = 0x8000000000000000L;

  static final int SIGNIFICAND_BITS = 52;

  static final int EXPONENT_BIAS = 1023;

  /** The implicit 1 bit that is omitted in significands of normal doubles. */
  static final long IMPLICIT_BIT = SIGNIFICAND_MASK + 1;

  static long getSignificand(double d) {
    checkArgument(isFinite(d), "not a normal value");

   */
  open fun connectionReleased(
    call: Call,
    connection: Connection,
  ) {
  }

  /**
   * Invoked just prior to sending request headers.
   *
   * The connection is implicit, and will generally relate to the last [connectionAcquired] event.
   *
   * This can be invoked more than 1 time for a single [Call]. For example, if the response to the
   * [Call.request] is a redirect to a different address.

   * TBSCertificate ::= SEQUENCE  {
   *   version         [0]  EXPLICIT Version DEFAULT v1,
   *   serialNumber         CertificateSerialNumber,
   *   signature            AlgorithmIdentifier,
   *   issuer               Name,
   *   validity             Validity,
   *   subject              Name,
   *   subjectPublicKeyInfo SubjectPublicKeyInfo,
   *   issuerUniqueID  [1]  IMPLICIT UniqueIdentifier OPTIONAL, -- If present, version MUST be v2 or v3

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

  // Double#doubleToRawLongBits(double)} spec.
  static final long SIGN_MASK = 0x8000000000000000L;

  static final int SIGNIFICAND_BITS = 52;

  static final int EXPONENT_BIAS = 1023;

  /** The implicit 1 bit that is omitted in significands of normal doubles. */
  static final long IMPLICIT_BIT = SIGNIFICAND_MASK + 1;

  static long getSignificand(double d) {
    checkArgument(isFinite(d), "not a normal value");

import com.google.common.collect.UnmodifiableIterator;
import java.util.AbstractSet;
import java.util.Map;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A class to represent the set of edges connecting an (implicit) origin node to a target node.
 *
 * <p>The {@link #nodeToOutEdge} map means this class only works on networks without parallel edges.
 * See {@link MultiEdgesConnecting} for a class that works with parallel edges.
 *

    * Деякі з цих потоків підходять для створення власного провайдера автентифікації OAuth 2.0 (наприклад, Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub тощо):
        * `implicit`— неявний
        * `clientCredentials`— облікові дані клієнта
        * `authorizationCode` — код авторизації
    * Але є один окремий «потік», який ідеально підходить для реалізації автентифікації всередині одного додатку:

    * 🇺🇸🔍 🔰 🤝.
    * 🇺🇸🔍 📰, ♒️.
* `oauth2`: 🌐 Oauth2️⃣ 🌌 🍵 💂‍♂ (🤙 "💧").
    * 📚 👫 💧 ☑ 🏗 ✳ 2️⃣.0️⃣ 🤝 🐕‍🦺 (💖 🇺🇸🔍, 👱📔, 👱📔, 📂, ♒️):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * ✋️ 📤 1️⃣ 🎯 "💧" 👈 💪 👌 ⚙️ 🚚 🤝 🎏 🈸 🔗:
        * `password`: ⏭ 📃 🔜 📔 🖼 👉.
* `openIdConnect`: ✔️ 🌌 🔬 ❔ 🔎 Oauth2️⃣ 🤝 📊 🔁.

* `oauth2`: todas as formas do OAuth2 para lidar com segurança (chamados "fluxos").
    * Vários desses fluxos são apropriados para construir um provedor de autenticação OAuth2 (como Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub, etc):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * Mas existe um “fluxo” específico que pode ser perfeitamente usado para resolver autenticação diretamente na mesma aplicação: