If there's a security flaw in your code, it will still exist.

## Be Nice

First of all, be nice. 😊

You probably are super nice if you were added to the team, but it's worth mentioning it. 🤓

### When Things are Difficult

When things are great, everything is easier, so that doesn't need much instructions. But when things are difficult, here are some guidelines.

A downside of this structure is that it is difficult to do focused work on the Gradle UI.

## Decision

Introduce a "UI" architecture module to the core platform, and move the user interaction services to this new module.

This includes:

2024-02-07

## Context

The Gradle code base is essentially a large monolith, without strong internal boundaries.
This has a number of negative effects on productivity, including:

- Unclear ownership of code.
- Difficult to focus on one particular area.
- Unintended coupling between areas of the code, including tests.

## Decision

Organize the Gradle code base into a set of coarse-grained "architecture modules".

* **Harder code search and refactoring**: Searching for identifiers, method names, or documentation becomes more difficult when multiple spellings exist for the same concept
* **Inconsistent API surface**: Public APIs with mixed spelling conventions appear less professional and polished

# Security { #security }

There are many ways to handle security, authentication and authorization.

And it normally is a complex and "difficult" topic.

In many frameworks and systems just handling security and authentication takes a big amount of effort and code (in many cases it can be 50% or more of all the code written).

 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

# `VERSION` parameter.
# Note: 'Templatizing' this and the other conditional branches would require
# defining several variables (version, os, path) making it difficult to maintain
# and extend for future modifications.
case "${VERSION}" in
devtoolset-7)
  # Download binary glibc 2.12 shared library release.

dynamic_context = "test_function"
omit = [
    "docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_04_py39.py",
    "docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_04_py310.py",
    "docs_src/dependencies/tutorial008_an_py39.py",  # difficult to mock
    "docs_src/dependencies/tutorial013_an_py310.py",  # temporary code example?
    "docs_src/dependencies/tutorial014_an_py310.py",  # temporary code example?
    # Pydantic v1 migration, no longer tested