* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

The *Build Tool Team* has decided to use Architectural Decision Records (aka ADR) to track decisions we want to follow.

The main logic with ADRs is to describe (architectural) decisions made:

## Architecture Standards

**Experimental!**

We'd like to capture our architectural decisions about the build tool as [Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)](https://adr.github.io/).
For now we just have this global repository of ADRs.
If we see fit, we can break these out to per-platform ones, or keep a hybrid approach to having global and platform-specific ADSs.

Our aim is to keep the process lightweight and approachable.

}{
	{ // 1.
		name: "empty string",
		dsc:  "",
		expDsc: ReplicateDecision{
			targetsMap: map[string]replicateTargetDecision{},
		},
		expErr: nil,
	},

	{ // 2.
		name:   "replicate decision for one target",
		dsc:    "arn:minio:replication::id:bucket=true;false;arn:minio:replication::id:bucket;id",
		expErr: nil,
		expDsc: ReplicateDecision{
			targetsMap: map[string]replicateTargetDecision{

 * object). So it is important to not call {@link #dispatch} while holding any locks. This is why
 * {@link #enqueue} and {@link #dispatch} are 2 different methods. It is expected that the decision
 * to run a particular event is made during the state change, but the decision to actually invoke
 * the listeners can be delayed slightly so that locks can be dropped. Also, because {@link
 * #dispatch} is expected to be called concurrently, it is idempotent.
 */

		}
	}
	return b.String()
}

// ResyncDecision is a struct representing a map with target's individual resync decisions
type ResyncDecision struct {
	targets map[string]ResyncTargetDecision
}

// Empty returns true if no targets with resync decision present
func (r ResyncDecision) Empty() bool {
	return r.targets == nil
}

func (r ResyncDecision) mustResync() bool {

	// VersionPurgeStatuses holds the internal
	VersionPurgeStatuses string `xml:"VersionPurgeStatuses"`
	// ReplicateDecisionStr stringified representation of replication decision
	ReplicateDecisionStr string `xml:"-"`
}

// createBucketLocationConfiguration container for bucket configuration request from client.
// Used for parsing the location from the request body for Makebucket.

 * sample of code points to detect Unicode control characters commonly used in binary file
 * signatures.
 *
 * @param codePointLimit the number of code points to read in order to make a decision.
 */
internal fun BufferedSource.isProbablyUtf8(codePointLimit: Long = Long.MAX_VALUE): Boolean {
  try {
    val peek = peek()
    for (i in 0 until codePointLimit) {
      if (peek.exhausted()) {
        break

 * object). So it is important to not call {@link #dispatch} while holding any locks. This is why
 * {@link #enqueue} and {@link #dispatch} are 2 different methods. It is expected that the decision
 * to run a particular event is made during the state change, but the decision to actually invoke
 * the listeners can be delayed slightly so that locks can be dropped. Also, because {@link
 * #dispatch} is expected to be called concurrently, it is idempotent.
 */

- **Reduce the size of the Gradle distribution** - We no longer need to carry multiple standard libraries for different languages.

## Decision

We do not introduce new public API methods that include Groovy types in their signatures.
Existing Groovy methods will not be removed immediately.

## Status

ACCEPTED

## Consequences

What would have happened if Gradle was limited to _only Java 11_ at the time?

## Decision

1. The Gradle distribution will never include a Java runtime.
   Instead, Gradle will leverage Java toolchains for the Daemon and worker processes.