public static class Chars extends SampleElements<Character> {
    public Chars() {
      // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering
      super('b', 'a', 'c', 'd', 'e');
    }
  }

  public static class Enums extends SampleElements<AnEnum> {
    public Enums() {
      // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering
      super(AnEnum.B, AnEnum.A, AnEnum.C, AnEnum.D, AnEnum.E);
    }
  }

  public static class Chars extends SampleElements<Character> {
    public Chars() {
      // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering
      super('b', 'a', 'c', 'd', 'e');
    }
  }

  public static class Enums extends SampleElements<AnEnum> {
    public Enums() {
      // elements aren't sorted, to better test SortedSet iteration ordering
      super(AnEnum.B, AnEnum.A, AnEnum.C, AnEnum.D, AnEnum.E);
    }
  }

* Then check if the question (the vast majority are questions) is **clear**.

* In many cases the question asked is about an imaginary solution from the user, but there might be a **better** one. If you can understand the problem and use case better, you might be able to suggest a better **alternative solution**.

* If you can't understand the question, ask for more **details**.

### Reproduce the problem { #reproduce-the-problem }

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * stream is empty.
   *
   * <p>Equivalent to {@code stream.reduce((a, b) -> b)}, but may perform significantly better. This
   * method's runtime will be between O(log n) and O(n), performing better on <a
   * href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/html/StreamParallelGuidance.html">efficiently splittable</a>
   * streams.
   *

        md4.update(Strings.getUNIBytes(password));
        return md4.digest();
    }

    /**
     * Generates the NT password hash for the given password.
     * This version accepts char[] for better security.
     *
     * @param password the password to hash as char array
     * @return nt password hash
     */
    public static byte[] getNTHash(final char[] password) {
        if (password == null) {

  public @Nullable V put(K key, @ParametricNullness V value) {
    return super.put(key, value);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride") // b/192446478: RedundantOverride ignores some annotations.
  // TODO(b/192446998): Remove this override after tools understand nullness better.

You could also create a `JSONResponse` directly and return it.

/// tip

You will normally have much better performance using a [Response Model](../tutorial/response-model.md) than returning a `JSONResponse` directly, as that way it serializes the data using Pydantic, in Rust.

///

## Return a `Response` { #return-a-response }

This translation was made by AI guided by humans. 🤝

It could have mistakes of misunderstanding the original meaning, or looking unnatural, etc. 🤖

You can improve this translation by [helping us guide the AI LLM better](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/contributing/#translations).

[English version](ENGLISH_VERSION_URL)

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server
    * **Starlette**: (uses Uvicorn) a web microframework