}

	for i := 0; i < config.Toys; i++ {
		user.Toys = append(user.Toys, Toy{Name: name + "_toy_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	for i := 0; i < config.Tools; i++ {
		user.Tools = append(user.Tools, Tools{Name: name + "_tool_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	if config.Company {
		user.Company = Company{Name: "company-" + name}
	}

	if config.Manager {

## Tools {#tools}

### Go command {#go-command}

## Tools {#tools}

### Go command {#go-command}

### Cgo {#cgo}

Cgo currently refuses to compile calls to a C function which has multiple
incompatible declarations. For instance, if `f` is declared as both `void f(int)`
and `void f(double)`, cgo will report an error instead of possibly generating an
incorrect call sequence for `f(0)`. New in this release is a better detector for
this error condition when the incompatible declarations appear in different

Guillaume Nodet <******@****.***> 1729859506 +0200

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.api;

import javax.tools.DocumentationTool;
import javax.tools.JavaFileManager;
import javax.tools.StandardLocation;

import java.io.File;
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.StringJoiner;

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

Wenn Sie sich die Benchmarks ansehen, werden häufig mehrere Tools mit unterschiedlichen Eigenschaften als gleichwertig verglichen.

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

     *
     * @return the toolchain type
     */
    String getType();

    /**
     * Gets the platform tool executable.
     *
     * @param toolName the tool platform independent tool name
     * @return file representing the tool executable, or null if the tool cannot be found
     */
    String findTool(String toolName);

    /**
     * Let the toolchain decide if it matches requirements defined

			Manager: &User{
				Name: "Alexis Manager",
				Tools: []Tools{
					{Name: "Alexis Tool 1"},
					{Name: "Alexis Tool 2"},
				},
			},
		},
		{
			Name: "TestMergeNestedPreloadWithNestedJoin-2",
			Manager: &User{
				Name: "Jinzhu Manager",
				Tools: []Tools{
					{Name: "Jinzhu Tool 1"},
					{Name: "Jinzhu Tool 2"},
				},
			},
		},
	}

	DB.Create(&users)

ENV BAZEL_LLVM "C:\tools\LLVM"

# These variables may be useful, but so far haven't been. Keeping for posterity.
# ENV CLANG_COMPILER_PATH "C:\tools\llvm\bin\clang.exe"
# ENV CC "C:\tools\llvm\bin\clang.exe"
# ENV BAZEL_COMPILER "C:\tools\llvm\bin\clang.exe"

ENV BAZEL_SH "C:\tools\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe"