}

    public void setArtifactUri(String artifactUri) {
        this.artifactUri = artifactUri;
    }

    public String getWhy() {
        return why;
    }

    public void setWhy(String why) {
        this.why = why;
    }

    public String getError() {
        return error;
    }

    public void setError(String error) {
        this.error = error;
    }

   - Include context in the summary: what changed, why, and any issue references.
   - Use `[WIP]` for in-progress PRs to avoid premature merging or choose GitHub draft PRs.

2. **Commits**:
   - Write clear messages: what changed and why (e.g., “Refactor S3 API handler to reduce latency so that requests process 20% faster”).

projects: ["golang/29"]
body:
- type: textarea
  attributes:
    label: Summary
    description: >
      What change are you proposing to the upload configuration, and why?
      For new upload configuration, which new counters will be collected, what
      do they measure, and why is it important to collect them?
      Note that uploaded data must not carry sensitive user information.

 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>

# Policy on AI-Assisted Contributions to the Gradle Build Tool

We use AI tools daily and welcome AI-assisted contributions—provided the human behind them meets the standards below.

## Why this policy exists

There is a fundamental **asymmetry** between submitting a contribution and reviewing one: AI tools make it easy to generate and submit large amounts of code, but they do not make it equally faster for us to review it. 

   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either

   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either

 *
 * @param groupId the Maven groupId of the plugin
 * @param artifactId the Maven artifactId of the plugin
 * @param minVersion the minimum version required for Maven 4 compatibility
 * @param reason the reason why this plugin needs to be upgraded
 */

   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either

  static final EmptyImmutableSetMultimap INSTANCE = new EmptyImmutableSetMultimap();

  private EmptyImmutableSetMultimap() {
    super(ImmutableMap.of(), 0, null);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(b/242884182): Figure out why this helps produce the same class file when we compile most
   * of common.collect a second time with the results of the first compilation on the classpath. Or