import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * The presence of this annotation on a type indicates that the type may be used with <a
 * href="https://www.gwtproject.org/">GWT</a> or <a href="https://github.com/google/j2cl">J2CL</a>.
 *
 * <p>Note that a {@code GwtCompatible} type may have some {@link GwtIncompatible} methods.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)

   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields

   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * The presence of this annotation on a type indicates that the type may be used with <a
 * href="https://www.gwtproject.org/">GWT</a> or <a href="https://github.com/google/j2cl">J2CL</a>.
 *
 * <p>Note that a {@code GwtCompatible} type may have some {@link GwtIncompatible} methods.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)

  }

  private static class StringWrapper {
    private final String value;

    StringWrapper(String value) {
      this.value = value;
    }
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // J2CL generics problem
  public void testAndThen() {
    Converter<StringWrapper, String> first =
        new Converter<StringWrapper, String>() {
          @Override
          protected String doForward(StringWrapper object) {

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // not used under GWT, and super.getName() is not available under J2CL
  public final String getTestMethodName() {
    return super.getName();
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // not used under GWT, and super.getName() is not available under J2CL
  @Override
  public String getName() {
    return super.getName() + '[' + suiteName + ']';
  }

  /**

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // not used under GWT, and super.getName() is not available under J2CL
  public final String getTestMethodName() {
    return super.getName();
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // not used under GWT, and super.getName() is not available under J2CL
  @Override
  public String getName() {
    return super.getName() + '[' + suiteName + ']';
  }

  /**

 *
 * @since 16.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public final class Runnables {
  /*
   * If we inline this, it's not longer a singleton under Android (at least under the Marshmallow
   * version that we're testing under) or J2CL.
   *
   * That's not necessarily a real-world problem, but it does break our tests.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({"InlineLambdaConstant", "UnnecessaryLambda"})
  private static final Runnable EMPTY_RUNNABLE = () -> {};

    return result;
  }

  /*
   * If I understand correctly:
   *
   * This needs to be a @JsMethod so that J2CL knows to look for a JavaScript implemention of
   * it in Platform.native.js. (The JavaScript implementation inline below is visible to *GWT*, but
   * *J2CL* doesn't look at it.)
   *
   * However, once it's a @JsMethod, GWT produces a warning. That's because (a) the *other* purpose

        .then(onFulfilled, onRejected);
  }
}

/**
 * Subset of the elemental2 IThenable interface without the single-parameter overload, which allows
 * us to implement it using a default implementation in J2cl ListenableFuture.
 */
@JsType(isNative = true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "IThenable")
interface IThenable<T extends @Nullable Object> {
  <V extends @Nullable Object> IThenable<V> then(