}
  }

  static void verifyThreadWasNotInterrupted() {
    // There is no thread interruption in GWT, so there's nothing to do.
  }

  static void clearInterrupt() {
    // There is no thread interruption in GWT, so there's nothing to do.
  }

  static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDoneFromTimeoutOverload(Future<V> future)
      throws ExecutionException {

HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS

OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE

  @ParametricNullness
  abstract T runInterruptibly() throws Exception;

  /**
   * Any interruption that happens as a result of calling interruptTask will arrive before this
   * method is called. Complete Futures here.
   */
  abstract void afterRanInterruptiblySuccess(@ParametricNullness T result);

  /**
   * Any interruption that happens as a result of calling interruptTask will arrive before this

qui offre de bonnes performances, une bonne stabilité, _etc._, afin que vos **utilisateurs** puissent **accéder** à
l'application efficacement et sans interruption ni problème.

Ceci contraste avec les étapes de **développement**, où vous êtes constamment en train de modifier le code, de le casser
et de le réparer, d'arrêter et de redémarrer le serveur de développement, _etc._

     * <p>If the Thread in use is interrupted before or during execution of the tasks in {@link
     * #queue}, the Executor will complete its tasks, and then restore the interruption. This means
     * that once the Thread returns to the Executor that this Executor composes, the interruption
     * will still be present. If the composed Executor is an ExecutorService, it can respond to

fun retryTlsHandshake(e: IOException): Boolean =
  when {
    // If there was a protocol problem, don't recover.
    e is ProtocolException -> false

    // If there was an interruption or timeout (SocketTimeoutException), don't recover.
    // For the socket connect timeout case we do not try the same host with a different
    // ConnectionSpec: we assume it is unreachable.

 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Jens Nyman
 * @since 1.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
// TODO: b/227335009 - Maybe change interruption behavior, but it requires thought.
@SuppressWarnings("Interruption")
public final class SimpleTimeLimiter implements TimeLimiter {

  private final ExecutorService executor;

  private SimpleTimeLimiter(ExecutorService executor) {

        SuggestCreator.Options options = new SuggestCreator.Options();
        assertNotNull(options);
    }

    // Test create with interruption
    public void test_create_withInterruption() {
        // Test interruption handling
        SuggestCreator.Options options = new SuggestCreator.Options();
        assertNotNull(options);
    }

    // Test purge success

          node.setNext(oldHead);
          if (casWaiters(oldHead, node)) {
            while (true) {
              OverflowAvoidingLockSupport.parkNanos(this, remainingNanos);
              // Check interruption first, if we woke up due to interruption we need to honor that.
              if (Thread.interrupted()) {
                removeWaiter(node);
                throw new InterruptedException();
              }