In this scenario of "fast food burgers with your crush", as there is a lot of waiting 🕙, it makes a lot more sense to have a concurrent system ⏸🔀⏯.

This is the case for most of the web applications.

Many, many users, but your server is waiting 🕙 for their not-so-good connection to send their requests.

And then waiting 🕙 again for the responses to come back.

<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Waiting for application startup.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Application startup complete.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Started server process [<font color="#06989A">27369</font>]
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Waiting for application startup.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Application startup complete.

<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Waiting for application startup.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Application startup complete.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Started server process [<font color="#06989A">27369</font>]
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Waiting for application startup.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Application startup complete.

 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link
 * RuntimeException}.
 *
 * <p>Here's an example that tests a {@code finalize} method:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);

   * protect ourselves from that we want to make sure that tasks don't spin too much waiting for the
   * interrupting thread to complete the protocol.
   */
  /*
   * This test hangs (or maybe is just *very* slow) under Android.
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Ideally, get this to pass under Android. Failing that, convince ourselves

 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link
 * RuntimeException}.
 *
 * <p>Here's an example that tests a {@code finalize} method:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);

              },
              "waiting": {
                "delay": 2628000,
                "message": "As this PR has been waiting for the original user for a while but seems to be inactive, it's now going to be closed. But if there's anyone interested, feel free to create a new PR."
              },

    while (true) {
      Thread.State state = t.getState();
      switch (state) {
        case RUNNABLE:
        case BLOCKED:
          Thread.yield();
          break;
        case WAITING:
          return;
        default:
          throw new AssertionError("unexpected state: " + state);
      }
    }
  }

  abstract static class OldAbstractFuture<V> implements ListenableFuture<V> {

   * @param numElements the number of elements to be waited for
   * @param timeout how long to wait before giving up
   * @return the number of elements transferred
   * @throws InterruptedException if interrupted while waiting
   * @since NEXT (but since 28.0 in the JRE flavor)
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // BlockingQueue
  @SuppressWarnings("Java7ApiChecker")

   * @param numElements the number of elements to be waited for
   * @param timeout how long to wait before giving up
   * @return the number of elements transferred
   * @throws InterruptedException if interrupted while waiting
   * @since 28.0 (but only since 33.4.0 in the Android flavor)
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // BlockingQueue
  public static <E> int drain(