assertFalse(violations.isEmpty());
        assertEquals(1, violations.size());

        ConstraintViolation<CustomMessageBean> violation = violations.iterator().next();
        assertEquals("Invalid cron expression format", violation.getMessage());
    }

    // Test annotation on method parameter
    public void test_annotationOnMethod() throws Exception {

    return new ExpiringMemoizingSupplier<>(delegate, toNanosSaturated(duration));
  }

  @VisibleForTesting
  @SuppressWarnings("GoodTime") // lots of violations
  static final class ExpiringMemoizingSupplier<T extends @Nullable Object>
      implements Supplier<T>, Serializable {
    private transient Object lock = new Object();

    final Supplier<T> delegate;

    return new ExpiringMemoizingSupplier<>(delegate, toNanosSaturated(duration));
  }

  @VisibleForTesting
  @SuppressWarnings("GoodTime") // lots of violations
  static final class ExpiringMemoizingSupplier<T extends @Nullable Object>
      implements Supplier<T>, Serializable {
    private transient Object lock = new Object();

    final Supplier<T> delegate;

              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Enable NullArgumentForNonNullParameter for
                   prod code. It's disabled automatically for "test code"
                   (which is good: our tests have intentional violations), but
                   Error Prone doesn't know it's building test code unless we
                   pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to

              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Enable NullArgumentForNonNullParameter for
                   prod code. It's disabled automatically for "test code"
                   (which is good: our tests have intentional violations), but
                   Error Prone doesn't know it's building test code unless we
                   pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to

        ),
      ).assertLogMatch(
        Regex(
          """callFailed: \S+(?:SSLProtocolException|SSLHandshakeException|TlsFatalAlert): .*(?:Unexpected handshake message: client_hello|Handshake message sequence violation, 1|Read error|Handshake failed|unexpected_message\(10\)).*""",
        ),

   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> when this method is used, the resulting map will use identity ({@code ==})
   * comparison to determine equality of keys, which is a technical violation of the {@link Map}
   * specification, and may not be what you expect.
   *
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the key strength was already set
   * @see WeakReference
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

    assertEquals("", matcher.trimFrom(s));
    assertEquals(s.length(), matcher.countIn(s));
  }

  // Kotlin subSequence()/replace() always return new strings, violating expectations of this test
  @J2ktIncompatible
  public void testGeneral() {
    doTestGeneral(is('a'), 'a', 'b');
    doTestGeneral(isNot('a'), 'b', 'a');
    doTestGeneral(anyOf("x"), 'x', 'z');

    assertEquals("", matcher.trimFrom(s));
    assertEquals(s.length(), matcher.countIn(s));
  }

  // Kotlin subSequence()/replace() always return new strings, violating expectations of this test
  @J2ktIncompatible
  public void testGeneral() {
    doTestGeneral(is('a'), 'a', 'b');
    doTestGeneral(isNot('a'), 'b', 'a');
    doTestGeneral(anyOf("x"), 'x', 'z');

   * actually remain in the file, something that it {@linkplain java.io.FileInputStream#skip(long)
   * specifies} it can do in its Javadoc despite the fact that it is violating the contract of
   * {@code InputStream.skip()}.
   */
  private static long skipSafely(InputStream in, long n) throws IOException {
    int available = in.available();