if objInfo.DeleteMarker || !objInfo.VersionPurgeStatus.Empty() {
		return nil
	}
	sseKMS := crypto.S3KMS.IsEncrypted(objInfo.UserDefined)
	sseS3 := crypto.S3.IsEncrypted(objInfo.UserDefined)
	if !sseKMS && !sseS3 { // neither sse-s3 nor sse-kms disallowed
		return errInvalidEncryptionParameters
	}
	if sseKMS && r.Encryption.Type == sses3 { // previously encrypted with sse-kms, now sse-s3 disallowed

	var objEncKey crypto.ObjectKey
	sseCopyKMS := crypto.S3KMS.IsEncrypted(srcInfo.UserDefined)
	sseCopyS3 := crypto.S3.IsEncrypted(srcInfo.UserDefined)
	sseCopyC := crypto.SSEC.IsEncrypted(srcInfo.UserDefined) && crypto.SSECopy.IsRequested(r.Header)
	sseC := crypto.SSEC.IsRequested(r.Header)
	sseS3 := crypto.S3.IsRequested(r.Header)
	sseKMS := crypto.S3KMS.IsRequested(r.Header)

		return nil
	case crypto.S3KMS:
		if GlobalKMS == nil {
			return errKMSNotConfigured
		}
		objectKey, err := crypto.S3KMS.UnsealObjectKey(GlobalKMS, metadata, bucket, object)
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}

		if len(cryptoCtx) == 0 {
			_, _, _, cryptoCtx, err = crypto.S3KMS.ParseMetadata(metadata)
			if err != nil {
				return err
			}
		}

              },
              "waiting": {
                "delay": 2628000,
                "message": "As this PR has been waiting for the original user for a while but seems to be inactive, it's now going to be closed. But if there's anyone interested, feel free to create a new PR."
              },
              "invalid": {
                "delay": 0,

            return ((Map) value).get(key);
        }

        final String message = String.format(
                "The token '%s' at position '%d' refers to a java.util.Map, but the value "
                        + "seems is an instance of '%s'",
                expression.subSequence(from, to), from, value.getClass());

        throw new IntrospectionException(message);
    }

    private static Object getIndexedValue(

   * href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6409434">Sun bug 6409434</a> is fixed.
   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6409434">Sun bug 6409434</a> is fixed.
   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6409434">Sun bug 6409434</a> is fixed.
   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

  }

  @Override
  protected Collection<Method> suppressForConcurrentHashMap() {
    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *

   * href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6409434">Sun bug 6409434</a> is fixed.
   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection