then <i>A</i> is synchronized before <i>B</i>.
All the atomic operations executed in a program behave as though executed
in some sequentially consistent order.
</p>

<p>
The preceding definition has the same semantics as C++’s sequentially consistent atomics
and Java’s <code>volatile</code> variables.
</p>

<h3 id="finalizer">Finalizers</h3>

<p>

            chain.id = i;
            chains.add(chain);
            authenticationManager.addChain(chain);
        }

        // Test order by using load which processes chains sequentially
        User user = createTestUser("testuser");
        for (int i = 0; i < chains.size(); i++) {
            User nextUser = createTestUser("user" + (i + 1));
            chains.get(i).loadResult = nextUser;

            assertEquals(24, encoded);
            assertEquals(flags, SMBUtil.readInt4(buffer, 16));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should encode multiple locks sequentially")
        void testSequentialEncoding() {
            Smb2Lock lock1 = new Smb2Lock(100L, 200L, 1);
            Smb2Lock lock2 = new Smb2Lock(300L, 400L, 2);
            Smb2Lock lock3 = new Smb2Lock(500L, 600L, 4);

   *     a unique integer (0, 1, etc.) will be supplied as the single parameter. This integer will
   *     be unique to the built instance of the ThreadFactory and will be assigned sequentially. For
   *     example, {@code "rpc-pool-%d"} will generate thread names like {@code "rpc-pool-0"}, {@code
   *     "rpc-pool-1"}, {@code "rpc-pool-2"}, etc.
   * @return this for the builder pattern
   */

        // Read another byte
        assertEquals(2, sis.read());

        // 2 bytes should remain
        assertEquals(2, sis.available());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Multiple messages are read sequentially")
    void multipleMessagesAreReadSequentially() throws IOException {
        // Create two messages
        byte[] data1 = new byte[] { 1, 2 };
        byte[] data2 = new byte[] { 3, 4, 5 };

  // putting them in `table` or in `next` bits, and subtract 1 again when we need an index value.
  //
  // The elements of `keys`, `values`, and `entries` are added sequentially, so that elements 0 to
  // `size() - 1` are used and remaining elements are not. This makes iteration straightforward.
  // Removing an entry generally involves moving the last element of each array to where the removed

            assertArrayEquals(data, readData, "File content should match");
        }
    }

    @Test
    void testSimpleMultipleFiles() throws Exception {
        // Test creating multiple files sequentially (simpler than concurrent access)
        for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
            SmbFile file = new SmbFile(baseUrl + "shared/multi" + i + ".txt", context);
            String content = "Content for file " + i;

// and formats ETags of SSE-C / SSE-KMS encrypted objects to
// be AWS S3 compliant.
//
// DecryptETags uses a KMS bulk decryption API, if available, which
// is more efficient than decrypting ETags sequentially.
func DecryptETags(ctx context.Context, k *kms.KMS, objects []ObjectInfo) error {
	const BatchSize = 250 // We process the objects in batches - 250 is a reasonable default.
	var (

   * across different segments.
   *
   * The page replacement algorithm's data structures are kept casually consistent with the map. The
   * ordering of writes to a segment is sequentially consistent. An update to the map and recording
   * of reads may not be immediately reflected on the algorithm's data structures. These structures

        void testFileActionRemovedByDelete() {
            assertEquals(0x00000009, FileNotifyInformation.FILE_ACTION_REMOVED_BY_DELETE);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Verify action constants are sequential and unique")
        void testActionConstantsAreUnique() {
            int[] actions = { FileNotifyInformation.FILE_ACTION_ADDED, FileNotifyInformation.FILE_ACTION_REMOVED,