func (r BatchJobKeyRotateV1) Notify(ctx context.Context, ri *batchJobInfo) error {
	return notifyEndpoint(ctx, ri, r.Flags.Notify.Endpoint, r.Flags.Notify.Token)
}

// KeyRotate rotates encryption key of an object
func (r *BatchJobKeyRotateV1) KeyRotate(ctx context.Context, api ObjectLayer, objInfo ObjectInfo) error {
	srcBucket := r.Bucket
	srcObject := objInfo.Name

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Booleans.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is somewhat faster.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(boolean[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Booleans.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is somewhat faster.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(boolean[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Ints.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(int[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Chars.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(char[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Shorts.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(short[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Shorts.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(short[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is somewhat faster.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(byte[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Chars.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(char[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**