Their sponsorship also demonstrates a strong commitment to the FastAPI **community** (you), showing that they care not only about offering a **great service** but also about supporting a **robust and thriving framework**, FastAPI. 🙇

For example, you might want to try:

* <a href="https://speakeasy.com/editor?utm_source=fastapi+repo&utm_medium=github+sponsorship" class="external-link" target="_blank">Speakeasy</a>

But keep in mind that, as everything is handled in memory, in a single list, it will only work while the process is running, and will only work with a single process.

If you need something easy to integrate with FastAPI but that is more robust, supported by Redis, PostgreSQL or others, check <a href="https://github.com/encode/broadcaster" class="external-link" target="_blank">encode/broadcaster</a>.

///

## More info { #more-info }

* **Easy**: Designed to be easy to use and learn. Less time reading docs.
* **Short**: Minimize code duplication. Multiple features from each parameter declaration. Fewer bugs.
* **Robust**: Get production-ready code. With automatic interactive documentation.

* **Easy**: Designed to be easy to use and learn. Less time reading docs.
* **Short**: Minimize code duplication. Multiple features from each parameter declaration. Fewer bugs.
* **Robust**: Get production-ready code. With automatic interactive documentation.

* **Kurz**: Minimieren Sie die Verdoppelung von Code. Mehrere Features aus jeder Parameterdeklaration. Weniger Bugs.
* **Robust**: Erhalten Sie produktionsreifen Code. Mit automatischer, interaktiver Dokumentation.

Go 1.24 changed the behavior of `go test -json` to emit build errors as JSON
instead of text.
These new JSON events are distinguished by new `Action` values,
but can still cause problems with CI systems that aren't robust to these events.
This behavior can be controlled with the `gotestjsonbuildtext` setting.
Using `gotestjsonbuildtext=1` restores the 1.23 behavior.
This setting will be removed in a future release, Go 1.28 at the earliest.

    boolean longWait = NANOSECONDS.toSeconds(thread.timeSpentBlocked) >= 5;
    // Count how long it actually took to return; we'll accept any number between the expected delay
    // and the approximate actual delay, to be robust to variance in thread scheduling.
    char overWaitNanosFirstDigit =
        Long.toString(thread.timeSpentBlocked - MILLISECONDS.toNanos(longWait ? 5000 : 3000))
            .charAt(0);

    boolean longWait = NANOSECONDS.toSeconds(thread.timeSpentBlocked) >= 5;
    // Count how long it actually took to return; we'll accept any number between the expected delay
    // and the approximate actual delay, to be robust to variance in thread scheduling.
    char overWaitNanosFirstDigit =
        Long.toString(thread.timeSpentBlocked - MILLISECONDS.toNanos(longWait ? 5000 : 3000))
            .charAt(0);

labels.crawling_info_thread_dump=Vidage de thread
labels.crawling_info_CrawlerStartTime=Heure de début du robot d'exploration
labels.crawling_info_CrawlerEndTime=Heure de fin du robot d'exploration
labels.crawling_info_CrawlerExecTime=Temps d'exécution du robot d'exploration
labels.crawling_info_CrawlerStatus=Statut du robot d'exploration
labels.crawling_info_WebFsCrawlExecTime=Temps d'exécution de l'exploration (Web/Fichier)

    /** XPath expression for extracting robots content from meta tags */
    private static final String META_NAME_ROBOTS_CONTENT = "//META[@name=\"robots\" or @name=\"ROBOTS\"]/@content";

    /** Robots tag value indicating no indexing or following */
    private static final String ROBOTS_TAG_NONE = "none";

    /** Robots tag value indicating no indexing */