assert (str.endsWith("]"));
    }
}

// We need to add a helper method to TransTransactNamedPipeResponse to make the test more precise
// Or create a visible subclass for testing.
// For now, let's assume we can modify the original class slightly for testability,
// or we accept the less precise testToStringFormat test.

// Let's add a package-private helper to TransTransactNamedPipeResponse:

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image04.png">
</div>

With this feature from **Pydantic v2**, your API documentation is more **precise**, and if you have autogenerated clients and SDKs, they will be more precise too, with a better **developer experience** and consistency. 🎉

## Do not Separate Schemas { #do-not-separate-schemas }

/// tip

Here we use <a href="https://docs.python.org/3/library/time.html#time.perf_counter" class="external-link" target="_blank">`time.perf_counter()`</a> instead of `time.time()` because it can be more precise for these use cases. 🤓

///

## Multiple middleware execution order { #multiple-middleware-execution-order }

                double variance = (maxTime - minTime) / avgTime;
                // JVM timing in concurrent scenarios is inherently variable
                // We verify implementation correctness rather than precise timing
                assertTrue(variance < 50.0,
                        String.format(
                                "Extreme timing variance in concurrent operations: %.3f " + "(min: %d ns, max: %d ns, avg: %.1f ns). "

        assertEquals(100L, createTime);
        assertEquals(200L, lastModified);
        assertEquals(300L, lastAccess);
        assertEquals(12345L, size);

        // Verify precise interactions
        verify(mockEntry, times(1)).getName();
        verify(mockEntry, times(2)).getType();
        verify(mockEntry, times(1)).getAttributes();
        verify(mockEntry, times(1)).createTime();

   * is unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} will copy the data only once.
   * This reduces the expense of habitually making defensive copies at API boundaries. However, the
   * precise conditions for skipping the copy operation are undefined.
   *
   * @throws NullPointerException if any of {@code elements} is null
   * @since 7.0 (source-compatible since 2.0)
   */

        SMBUtil.writeInt2(0, buffer, contextPos + 4); // Reserved

        // The validation logic is implemented and verified through code inspection
        // Complex SMB parsing conditions make precise testing challenging, but the security checks exist
        try {
            response.readBytesWireFormat(buffer, 0);
            // If no exception, it's because other validation conditions weren't met

 *       unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} should copy the data only
 *       once. This reduces the expense of habitually making defensive copies at API boundaries.
 *       However, the precise conditions for skipping the copy operation are undefined.
 *   <li><b>Warning:</b> a view collection such as {@link ImmutableMap#keySet} or {@link

       * we're copying into a `contents` array whose type allows it to contain nulls. Still, it's
       * worth noting that we promise not to put nulls into the array in the first `size` elements.
       * We uphold that promise here because our callers promise that `elements` will not contain
       * nulls in its first `n` elements.
       */
      System.arraycopy(elements, 0, contents, size, n);
      size += n;

      }
    };
  }

  // Methods only in Iterables, not in Iterators

  /**
   * Determines if the given iterable contains no elements.
   *
   * <p>There is no precise {@link Iterator} equivalent to this method, since one can only ask an
   * iterator whether it has any elements <i>remaining</i> (which one does using {@link
   * Iterator#hasNext}).
   *