Nevertheless, you still enforce those scopes, or any other security/authorization requirement, however you need, in your code.

In many cases, OAuth2 with scopes can be an overkill.

But if you know you need it, or you are curious, keep reading.

///

## OAuth2 scopes and OpenAPI { #oauth2-scopes-and-openapi }

Dennoch, verwenden Sie solche Scopes oder andere Sicherheits-/Autorisierungsanforderungen in Ihrem Code so wie Sie es möchten.

In vielen Fällen kann OAuth2 mit Scopes ein Overkill sein.

Aber wenn Sie wissen, dass Sie es brauchen oder neugierig sind, lesen Sie weiter.

///

## OAuth2-Scopes und OpenAPI

      this.function = checkNotNull(function);
    }

    /**
     * The default implementation inherited is based on iteration and removal of each element which
     * can be overkill. That's why we forward this call directly to the backing list.
     */
    @Override
    protected void removeRange(int fromIndex, int toIndex) {
      fromList.subList(fromIndex, toIndex).clear();
    }

        .isEqualTo(0xFFEEDDCC);
  }

  public void testByteArrayRoundTrips() {
    Random r = new Random(5);
    byte[] b = new byte[Ints.BYTES];

    // total overkill, but, it takes 0.1 sec so why not...
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      int num = r.nextInt();
      assertThat(Ints.fromByteArray(Ints.toByteArray(num))).isEqualTo(num);

      r.nextBytes(b);

                })
            .named("MinMaxPriorityQueue")
            .withFeatures(CollectionSize.ANY, CollectionFeature.GENERAL_PURPOSE)
            .createTestSuite());
    return suite;
  }

  // Overkill alert!  Test all combinations of 0-2 options during creation.

  public void testCreation_simple() {
    MinMaxPriorityQueue<Integer> queue = MinMaxPriorityQueue.create();
    assertEquals(11, queue.capacity());

  // below by testing their text-processing methods.

  // The organization of this test class is unusual, as it's not done by
  // method, but by overall "scenario". Also, the variety of actual tests we
  // do borders on absurd overkill. Better safe than sorry, though?

  @GwtIncompatible // java.util.BitSet
  public void testSetBits() {
    doTestSetBits(CharMatcher.any());

  // below by testing their text-processing methods.

  // The organization of this test class is unusual, as it's not done by
  // method, but by overall "scenario". Also, the variety of actual tests we
  // do borders on absurd overkill. Better safe than sorry, though?

  @GwtIncompatible // java.util.BitSet
  public void testSetBits() {
    doTestSetBits(CharMatcher.any());

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // Shorts.fromByteArray, Shorts.toByteArray
  public void testByteArrayRoundTrips() {
    Random r = new Random(5);
    byte[] b = new byte[Shorts.BYTES];

    // total overkill, but, it takes 0.1 sec so why not...
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      short num = (short) r.nextInt();
      assertThat(Shorts.fromByteArray(Shorts.toByteArray(num))).isEqualTo(num);

      r.nextBytes(b);

        .isEqualTo(0xFFEEDDCC);
  }

  public void testByteArrayRoundTrips() {
    Random r = new Random(5);
    byte[] b = new byte[Ints.BYTES];

    // total overkill, but, it takes 0.1 sec so why not...
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      int num = r.nextInt();
      assertThat(Ints.fromByteArray(Ints.toByteArray(num))).isEqualTo(num);

      r.nextBytes(b);

)

//go:generate msgp -file=$GOFILE

// SiteResyncStatus captures current replication resync status for a target site
type SiteResyncStatus struct {
	Version int `json:"version" msg:"v"`
	// Overall site status
	Status                        ResyncStatusType            `json:"st" msg:"ss"`
	DeplID                        string                      `json:"dId" msg:"did"`