Claro, os invasores não tentariam tudo isso de forma manual, eles escreveriam um programa para fazer isso, possivelmente com milhares ou milhões de testes por segundo. E obteriam apenas uma letra a mais por vez.

Mas fazendo isso, em alguns minutos ou horas os invasores teriam adivinhado o usuário e senha corretos, com a "ajuda" da nossa aplicação, apenas usando o tempo levado para responder.

#### Corrija com o `secrets.compare_digest()`

rn a||s?"nekaj sekund":"nekaj sekundami";case"ss":return n+=1===e?a?"sekundo":"sekundi":2===e?a||s?"sekundi":"sekundah":e<5?a||s?"sekunde":"sekundah":"sekund";case"m":return a?"ena minuta":"eno minuto";case"mm":return n+=1===e?a?"minuta":"minuto":2===e?a||s?"minuti":"minutama":e<5?a||s?"minute":"minutami":a||s?"minut":"minutami";case"h":return a?"ena ura":"eno uro";case"hh":return n+=1===e?a?"ura":"uro":2===e?a||s?"uri":"urama":e<5?a||s?"ure":"urami":a||s?"ur":"urami";case"d":return a||s?"en dan":"enim...

            String s = updatePolicy.substring(UPDATE_POLICY_INTERVAL.length() + 1);
            int minutes = Integer.parseInt(s);
            Calendar cal = Calendar.getInstance();
            cal.add(Calendar.MINUTE, -minutes);
            if (cal.getTime().after(lastModified)) {
                checkForUpdates = true;
            }
        }
        // else assume "never"

        }

        public boolean isTarget(final int hours, final int minutes, final int day) {
            if (!reverse) {
                return compareTime(fromHours, fromMinutes, hours, minutes) >= 0 && compareTime(hours, minutes, toHours, toMinutes) >= 0
                        && isInDays(day);
            }
            if (compareTime(hours, minutes, toHours, toMinutes) >= 0 && isInDays(day + 1)

  public void testParse_writeExpirationMinutes() {
    CacheBuilderSpec spec = parse("expireAfterWrite=10m");
    assertEquals(MINUTES, spec.writeExpirationTimeUnit);
    assertEquals(10L, spec.writeExpirationDuration);
    assertCacheBuilderEquivalence(
        CacheBuilder.newBuilder().expireAfterWrite(10L, MINUTES), CacheBuilder.from(spec));
  }

  public void testParse_writeExpirationSeconds() {

    @SuppressWarnings("unused") // https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/FutureReturnValueIgnored
    Future<?> possiblyIgnoredError = testExecutor.schedule(DO_NOTHING, 10, MINUTES);
    mock.assertLastMethodCalled("scheduleRunnable", 10, MINUTES);

    @SuppressWarnings("unused") // https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/FutureReturnValueIgnored
    Future<?> possiblyIgnoredError1 =

  public void testParse_writeExpirationMinutes() {
    CacheBuilderSpec spec = parse("expireAfterWrite=10m");
    assertEquals(MINUTES, spec.writeExpirationTimeUnit);
    assertEquals(10L, spec.writeExpirationDuration);
    assertCacheBuilderEquivalence(
        CacheBuilder.newBuilder().expireAfterWrite(10L, MINUTES), CacheBuilder.from(spec));
  }

  public void testParse_writeExpirationSeconds() {

	return t.staleUploadsExpiry
}

func (t *apiConfig) getDeleteCleanupInterval() time.Duration {
	t.mu.RLock()
	defer t.mu.RUnlock()

	if t.deleteCleanupInterval == 0 {
		return 5 * time.Minute // every 5 minutes
	}

	return t.deleteCleanupInterval
}

func (t *apiConfig) getClusterDeadline() time.Duration {
	t.mu.RLock()
	defer t.mu.RUnlock()

	if t.clusterDeadline == 0 {

	// By default, empty data usage cache
	*d = dataUsageCache{}

	load := func(name string, timeout time.Duration) (bool, error) {
		// Abandon if more than time.Minute, so we don't hold up scanner.
		// drive timeout by default is 2 minutes, we do not need to wait longer.
		ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, timeout)
		defer cancel()

        };

    future = service.schedule(runnable, 5, MINUTES);
    future.cancel(true);
    assertTrue(future.isCancelled());
    delegateFuture = (ScheduledFuture<?>) delegateQueue.element();
    assertTrue(delegateFuture.isCancelled());

    delegateQueue.clear();

    future = service.scheduleAtFixedRate(runnable, 5, 5, MINUTES);
    future.cancel(true);
    assertTrue(future.isCancelled());