reportActiveExternalHost = getInitParameter("reportActiveExternalHost", null, String.class);
        useEPSVwithIPv4 = getInitParameter("useEPSVwithIPv4", false, Boolean.class);
        isImplicit = getInitParameter("isImplicit", null, Boolean.class);
        trustManager = getInitParameter("trustManager", null, String.class);

        // ftp auth
        final FtpAuthenticationHolder holder = new FtpAuthenticationHolder();

  // Double#doubleToRawLongBits(double)} spec.
  static final long SIGN_MASK = 0x8000000000000000L;

  static final int SIGNIFICAND_BITS = 52;

  static final int EXPONENT_BIAS = 1023;

  /** The implicit 1 bit that is omitted in significands of normal doubles. */
  static final long IMPLICIT_BIT = SIGNIFICAND_MASK + 1;

  static long getSignificand(double d) {
    checkArgument(isFinite(d), "not a normal value");

  // Double#doubleToRawLongBits(double)} spec.
  static final long SIGN_MASK = 0x8000000000000000L;

  static final int SIGNIFICAND_BITS = 52;

  static final int EXPONENT_BIAS = 1023;

  /** The implicit 1 bit that is omitted in significands of normal doubles. */
  static final long IMPLICIT_BIT = SIGNIFICAND_MASK + 1;

  static long getSignificand(double d) {
    checkArgument(isFinite(d), "not a normal value");

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

        // Otherwise we get
        // ask ':tooling-api:publishGradleDistributionPublicationToRemoteRepository' uses this output of task ':tooling-api:signLocalPublication'
        // without declaring an explicit or implicit dependency. This can lead to incorrect results being produced, depending on what order the tasks are executed.
        tasks.named("publishGradleDistributionPublicationToRemoteRepository") {

        // allows code like "tf.constant(1.)" or "tf.reduce_sum(..., axis=1)"
        // (where the value starts on the host), without allowing other implicit
        // copies/broadcasts. Other implicit copies may be supported eventually,
        // but need special handling for gradients (gradient of copy-on is not
        // just copy-off but includes a sum) and consideration of performance.
        //

            InputLocation location = plugin.getLocation("");
            if (location != null && location.getSource() != null) {
                trackingData.add(indent + location.getSource().getModelId() + " (implicit)");
                indent += "  ";
            }
        } else if (collectStepTrace != null) {
            if (collectStepTrace.getPath().get(0).getArtifact() == null) {
                return;
            }

				key, subSys)
		}
		h = config.HelpKVS{value}
	}

	help := config.HelpKVS{}

	// Only for multiple targets, make sure
	// to list the ENV, for regular k/v EnableKey is
	// implicit, for ENVs we cannot make it implicit.
	if subSysHelp.MultipleTargets {
		key := madmin.EnableKey
		if envOnly {
			key = config.EnvPrefix + strings.ToTitle(subSys) + config.EnvWordDelimiter + strings.ToTitle(madmin.EnableKey)
		}

Am häufigsten ist der „Implicit“-Flow.

Am sichersten ist der „Code“-Flow, die Implementierung ist jedoch komplexer, da mehr Schritte erforderlich sind. Da er komplexer ist, schlagen viele Anbieter letztendlich den „Implicit“-Flow vor.

/// note | "Hinweis"

			pods = append(pods, pod)
		}
	}
	return pods
}

// EnqueueNamespace takes a Namespace and enqueues all Pod objects that make need an update
// TODO it is sort of pointless/confusing/implicit to populate Old and New with the same reference here
func (s *InformerHandlers) enqueueNamespace(o controllers.Object) {
	namespace := o.GetName()
	labels := o.GetLabels()