throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not implemented yet");
    }

    /**
     * Searches a view asynchronously (not implemented).
     *
     * @param request the search view request
     * @return never returns as this operation is not implemented
     * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always thrown as this operation is not implemented
     */
    @Override

  }

  public void testConstraint() {
    /*
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

* Why is this change done? What's the use case?
* For user-facing features, what will the API look like?
* What test cases should it have? What could go wrong?
* How will it roughly be implemented? We'll happily provide code pointers to save you time.

We may ask you to answer these questions directly in the GitHub issue or (for large changes) in a shared Google Doc.

  }

  /** Provides a lexicographical comparator implementation selected based on the current runtime. */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static final class LexicographicalComparatorHolder {
    /**
     * Interface implemented by {@link UnsafeComparator}, extracted so that we can refer to it
     * without referring to {@link UnsafeComparator} itself.
     */
    interface LexicographicalComparator extends Comparator<byte[]> {

    return accessibleObject.getDeclaredAnnotations();
  }

  // We ought to be able to implement GenericDeclaration instead its parent AnnotatedElement.
  // That would give us this method declaration. But for some reason, implementing
  // GenericDeclaration leads to weird errors in Android tests:
  // IncompatibleClassChangeError: interface not implemented
  /** See {@link java.lang.reflect.GenericDeclaration#getTypeParameters()}. */

  public static int compare(float a, float b) {
    return Float.compare(a, b);
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if {@code value} represents a real number. This is equivalent to, but not
   * necessarily implemented as, {@code !(Float.isInfinite(value) || Float.isNaN(value))}.
   *
   * <p>Prefer {@link Float#isFinite(float)} instead.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */
  @InlineMe(replacement = "Float.isFinite(value)")

  public static int compare(double a, double b) {
    return Double.compare(a, b);
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if {@code value} represents a real number. This is equivalent to, but not
   * necessarily implemented as, {@code !(Double.isInfinite(value) || Double.isNaN(value))}.
   *
   * <p>Prefer {@link Double#isFinite(double)} instead.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */
  @InlineMe(replacement = "Double.isFinite(value)")

   * its capacity threshold.
   *
   * The Least Recently Used page replacement algorithm was chosen due to its simplicity, high hit
   * rate, and ability to be implemented with O(1) time complexity. The initial LRU implementation
   * operates per-segment rather than globally for increased implementation simplicity. We expect
   * the cache hit rate to be similar to that of a global LRU algorithm.

   * its capacity threshold.
   *
   * The Least Recently Used page replacement algorithm was chosen due to its simplicity, high hit
   * rate, and ability to be implemented with O(1) time complexity. The initial LRU implementation
   * operates per-segment rather than globally for increased implementation simplicity. We expect
   * the cache hit rate to be similar to that of a global LRU algorithm.

   * its capacity threshold.
   *
   * The Least Recently Used page replacement algorithm was chosen due to its simplicity, high hit
   * rate, and ability to be implemented with O(1) time complexity. The initial LRU implementation
   * operates per-segment rather than globally for increased implementation simplicity. We expect
   * the cache hit rate to be similar to that of a global LRU algorithm.