assertThat(Enums.getIfPresent(TestEnum.class, "POODLE")).hasValue(TestEnum.POODLE);

    assertThat(Enums.getIfPresent(TestEnum.class, "CHEETO")).isPresent();
    assertThat(Enums.getIfPresent(TestEnum.class, "HONDA")).isPresent();
    assertThat(Enums.getIfPresent(TestEnum.class, "POODLE")).isPresent();

    assertThat(Enums.getIfPresent(TestEnum.class, "CHEETO")).hasValue(TestEnum.CHEETO);

          .that(returnType.getComponentType())
          .isEqualTo(annotationClass.getDeclaringClass());
    }
  }

  // This is public so that tests for Feature enums we haven't yet imagined
  // can reuse it.
  public static <E extends Enum<?> & Feature<?>> void assertGoodFeatureEnum(
      Class<E> featureEnumClass) {
    Class<?>[] classes = featureEnumClass.getDeclaredClasses();
    for (Class<?> containedClass : classes) {

<img src="/img/tutorial/path-operation-configuration/image01.png">

### Tags con Enums { #tags-with-enums }

Si tienes una gran aplicación, podrías terminar acumulando **varias tags**, y querrías asegurarte de que siempre uses la **misma tag** para *path operations* relacionadas.

En estos casos, podría tener sentido almacenar las tags en un `Enum`.

**FastAPI** soporta eso de la misma manera que con strings normales:

<img src="/img/tutorial/path-operation-configuration/image01.png">

### Tags com Enums { #tags-with-enums }

Se você tem uma grande aplicação, você pode acabar acumulando **várias tags**, e você gostaria de ter certeza de que você sempre usa a **mesma tag** para *operações de rota* relacionadas.

Nestes casos, pode fazer sentido armazenar as tags em um `Enum`.

**FastAPI** suporta isso da mesma maneira que com strings simples:

<img src="/img/tutorial/path-operation-configuration/image01.png">

### Tags with Enums { #tags-with-enums }

If you have a big application, you might end up accumulating **several tags**, and you would want to make sure you always use the **same tag** for related *path operations*.

In these cases, it could make sense to store the tags in an `Enum`.

**FastAPI** supports that the same way as with plain strings:

<img src="/img/tutorial/path-operation-configuration/image01.png">

### Tags mittels Enumeration { #tags-with-enums }

Wenn Sie eine große Anwendung haben, können sich am Ende **viele Tags** anhäufen, und Sie möchten sicherstellen, dass Sie für verwandte *Pfadoperationen* immer den **gleichen Tag** verwenden.

In diesem Fall macht es Sinn, die Tags in einem `Enum` zu speichern.

**FastAPI** unterstützt das auf die gleiche Weise wie einfache Strings:

### Теги с перечислениями { #tags-with-enums }

Если у вас большое приложение, вы можете прийти к необходимости добавить **несколько тегов**, и возможно, вы захотите убедиться в том, что всегда используете **один и тот же тег** для связанных *операций пути*.

В этих случаях, имеет смысл хранить теги в классе `Enum`.

**FastAPI** поддерживает это так же, как и в случае с обычными строками:

import json
from collections.abc import (
    AsyncIterator,
    Awaitable,
    Collection,
    Coroutine,
    Mapping,
    Sequence,
)
from contextlib import AsyncExitStack, asynccontextmanager
from enum import Enum, IntEnum
from typing import (
    Annotated,
    Any,
    Callable,
    Optional,
    Union,
)

from annotated_doc import Doc
from fastapi import params
from fastapi._compat import (

* ✨ Add support for tags with Enums. PR [#4468](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/4468) by [@tiangolo](https://github.com/tiangolo). New docs: [Path Operation Configuration - Tags with Enums](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/path-operation-configuration/#tags-with-enums).

  |
  | o need to clean up all the descriptions, matching anything to the current project-descriptor.xml file and
  |   improving on that
  |
  | o use enums where appropriate (eg dependency scope)
  |
  | o a number of elements have a groupId/artifactId and sometimes version. It would be good to have them all extend one
  |   definition of these types
  |
-->