/**
   * Prevents the given methods from being run as part of the test suite.
   *
   * <p>Note: in principle this should never need to be used, but it might be useful if the
   * semantics of an implementation disagree in unforeseen ways with the semantics expected by a
   * test, or to keep dependent builds clean in spite of an erroneous test.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Method... methods) {

  /**
   * Prevents the given methods from being run as part of the test suite.
   *
   * <p>Note: in principle this should never need to be used, but it might be useful if the
   * semantics of an implementation disagree in unforeseen ways with the semantics expected by a
   * test, or to keep dependent builds clean in spite of an erroneous test.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Method... methods) {

Try to find the good side. In general, if people are not being unfriendly, try to thank their effort and interest, even if you disagree with the main subject (discussion, PR), just thank them for being interested in the project, or for having dedicated some time to try to do something.

It's difficult to convey emotion in text, use emojis to help. 😅

			t.Errorf(`Join(Split(%q, %q, %d), %q) = %q`, tt.s, tt.sep, tt.n, tt.sep, s)
		}
		if tt.n < 0 {
			b := sliceOfString(Split([]byte(tt.s), []byte(tt.sep)))
			if !slices.Equal(result, b) {
				t.Errorf("Split disagrees with SplitN(%q, %q, %d) = %v; want %v", tt.s, tt.sep, tt.n, b, a)
			}
		}
		if len(a) > 0 {
			in, out := a[0], s
			if cap(in) == cap(out) && &in[:1][0] == &out[:1][0] {