@Test
  public void equivalent_selfLoop_directedVsUndirected() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N1, E11);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 = createNetwork(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.addEdge(N1, N1, E11);

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ.
  @Test

  @Test
  public void equivalent_selfLoop_directedVsUndirected() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N1, E11);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 = createNetwork(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.addEdge(N1, N1, E11);

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ.
  @Test

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_directedVsUndirected() {
    graph.putEdge(N1, N2);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 = createGraph(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.putEdge(N1, N2);

    assertThat(graph).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but directedness differs.
  @Test

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_directedVsUndirected() {
    graph.putEdge(N1, N2);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 = createGraph(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.putEdge(N1, N2);

    assertThat(graph).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but directedness differs.
  @Test

    attributes:
      label: Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?
      description: If so, how does this proposal differ?
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 
        1. Mention the related proposals 
        2. then describe how this proposal differs       
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: error-handling-proposal
    attributes:

		}

		if actualError.BucketName != bucketName {
			t.Fatal(failTestStr(anonTestStr, "error response bucket name differs from expected value"))
		}

		if actualError.Key != objectName {
			t.Fatal(failTestStr(anonTestStr, "error response object name differs from expected value"))
		}
	}

	// test for unknown auth case.
	anonReq.Body = readerTwo

   * input futures, if all succeed.
   *
   * <p>The list of results is in the same order as the input list.
   *
   * <p>This differs from {@link #successfulAsList(ListenableFuture[])} in that it will return a
   * failed future if any of the items fails.
   *
   * <p>Canceling this future will attempt to cancel all the component futures, and if any of the

    // be released.
    return 1L << ((Long.SIZE - 1) - Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(x));
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if {@code x} represents a power of two.
   *
   * <p>This differs from {@code Long.bitCount(x) == 1}, because {@code
   * Long.bitCount(Long.MIN_VALUE) == 1}, but {@link Long#MIN_VALUE} is not a power of two.
   */

    // be released.
    return 1L << ((Long.SIZE - 1) - Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(x));
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if {@code x} represents a power of two.
   *
   * <p>This differs from {@code Long.bitCount(x) == 1}, because {@code
   * Long.bitCount(Long.MIN_VALUE) == 1}, but {@link Long#MIN_VALUE} is not a power of two.
   */

   * input futures, if all succeed.
   *
   * <p>The list of results is in the same order as the input list.
   *
   * <p>This differs from {@link #successfulAsList(ListenableFuture[])} in that it will return a
   * failed future if any of the items fails.
   *
   * <p>Canceling this future will attempt to cancel all the component futures, and if any of the