/*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a thread completion at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive join() call.
     */
    TimedThread thread = TimedThread.createWithDelay(LONG_DELAY_MS);
    repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(20, tearDownStack);
    thread.joinUnsuccessfully(70);

        int originalSize = stopwordsFile.stopwordsItemList.size();
        StopwordsItem item = stopwordsFile.get(1).get();
        stopwordsFile.delete(item);

        // Verify the item count decreased
        // Note: get(1) may still return an item if IDs are reassigned
        assertTrue(stopwordsFile.stopwordsItemList.size() < originalSize);
    }

    // Test reload with InputStream

- Memory limits could be decreased with a `NotRequired` resize restart policy. When decreasing memory limits,a best-effort check was performed to prevent limits from decreasing below usage and triggering an OOM-kill. ([#133012](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/133012),...

- InPlacePodVerticalScaling: Memory limits cannot be decreased unless the memory resize restart policy is set to `RestartContainer`. Container resizePolicy is no longer mutable. ([#130183](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/130183), [@tallclair](https://github.com/tallclair)) [SIG Apps and Node]

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD)
  public void testSetCount_oneToThree_unsupported() {
    assertSetCountIncreasingFailure(e3(), 3);
  }

  // Unconditional setCount size decreases:

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testSetCount_oneToZero_supported() {
    assertSetCount(e0(), 0);
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD)
  public void testSetCount_oneToThree_unsupported() {
    assertSetCountIncreasingFailure(e3(), 3);
  }

  // Unconditional setCount size decreases:

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testSetCount_oneToZero_supported() {
    assertSetCount(e0(), 0);
  }

	initial := timeout.Timeout()

	for range dynamicTimeoutLogSize {
		timeout.LogSuccess(20 * time.Second)
	}

	adjusted := timeout.Timeout()

	if initial <= adjusted {
		t.Errorf("Failure to decrease timeout, expected %v to be less than %v", adjusted, initial)
	}
}

func TestDynamicTimeoutDualDecrease(t *testing.T) {
	timeout := newDynamicTimeout(time.Minute, time.Second)

	initial := timeout.Timeout()

	"time"
)

const (
	dynamicTimeoutIncreaseThresholdPct = 0.33 // Upper threshold for failures in order to increase timeout
	dynamicTimeoutDecreaseThresholdPct = 0.10 // Lower threshold for failures in order to decrease timeout
	dynamicTimeoutLogSize              = 16
	maxDuration                        = math.MaxInt64
	maxDynamicTimeout                  = 24 * time.Hour // Never set timeout bigger than this.
)

						cFns[i]()
					}
					return nil, err
				}
			}

			decReader := io.LimitReader(s2Reader, decLength)
			if decLength > compReadAheadSize {
				rah, err := readahead.NewReaderSize(decReader, compReadAheadBuffers, compReadAheadBufSize)
				if err == nil {
					decReader = rah
					cFns = append([]func(){func() {
						rah.Close()
					}}, cFns...)
				}
			}

    weakHashLength32WithSeeds(bytes, offset + length - 32, length * K1, K0, w);
    z += shiftMix(v[1]) * K1;
    x = rotateRight(z + x, 39) * K1;
    y = rotateRight(y, 33) * K1;

    // Decrease length to the nearest multiple of 64, and operate on 64-byte chunks.
    length = (length - 1) & ~63;
    do {
      x = rotateRight(x + y + v[0] + load64(bytes, offset + 16), 37) * K1;