"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": "unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyValue"
  },
  "status": {
    "observedGeneration": 1,
    "disruptedPods": {
      "disruptedPodsKey": null
    },
    "disruptionsAllowed": 3,
    "currentHealthy": 4,
    "desiredHealthy": 5,
    "expectedPods": 6,
    "conditions": [
      {
        "type": "typeValue",
        "status": "statusValue",
        "observedGeneration": 3,

		Status: policy.PodDisruptionBudgetStatus{
			DisruptionsAllowed: 0,
			CurrentHealthy:     2,
			DesiredHealthy:     3,
			ExpectedPods:       3,
		},
	}
	StatusStrategy.PrepareForUpdate(ctx, newPdb, oldPdb)
	if newPdb.Status.CurrentHealthy != 2 {
		t.Errorf("PodDisruptionBudget status updates should allow change of CurrentHealthy: %v", newPdb.Status.CurrentHealthy)
	}
	if newPdb.Spec.MinAvailable.IntValue() != 3 {

	DisruptionsAllowed int32 `json:"disruptionsAllowed" protobuf:"varint,3,opt,name=disruptionsAllowed"`

	// current number of healthy pods
	CurrentHealthy int32 `json:"currentHealthy" protobuf:"varint,4,opt,name=currentHealthy"`

	// minimum desired number of healthy pods
	DesiredHealthy int32 `json:"desiredHealthy" protobuf:"varint,5,opt,name=desiredHealthy"`

status:
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: "2004-01-01T01:01:01Z"
    message: messageValue
    observedGeneration: 3
    reason: reasonValue
    status: statusValue
    type: typeValue
  currentHealthy: 4
  desiredHealthy: 5
  disruptedPods:
    disruptedPodsKey: null
  disruptionsAllowed: 3
  expectedPods: 6

status:
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: "2004-01-01T01:01:01Z"
    message: messageValue
    observedGeneration: 3
    reason: reasonValue
    status: statusValue
    type: typeValue
  currentHealthy: 4
  desiredHealthy: 5
  disruptedPods:
    disruptedPodsKey: null
  disruptionsAllowed: 3
  expectedPods: 6

    "unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": "unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyValue"
  },
  "status": {
    "observedGeneration": 1,
    "disruptedPods": {
      "disruptedPodsKey": null
    },
    "disruptionsAllowed": 3,
    "currentHealthy": 4,
    "desiredHealthy": 5,
    "expectedPods": 6,
    "conditions": [
      {
        "type": "typeValue",
        "status": "statusValue",
        "observedGeneration": 3,

	// has not updated their status yet.  This isn't the only race, but it's a
	// common one that's easy to detect.
	disruptionsAllowed := currentHealthy - desiredHealthy
	if expectedCount <= 0 || disruptionsAllowed <= 0 {
		disruptionsAllowed = 0
	}

	if pdb.Status.CurrentHealthy == currentHealthy &&
		pdb.Status.DesiredHealthy == desiredHealthy &&
		pdb.Status.ExpectedPods == expectedCount &&

				Status: policyv1.PodDisruptionBudgetStatus{
					// This simulates 3 pods expected, our pod healthy, unhealthy pod is not ours.
					DisruptionsAllowed: 0,
					CurrentHealthy:     2,
					DesiredHealthy:     2,
				},
			}},
			eviction:            &policy.Eviction{ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "t7", Namespace: "default"}, DeleteOptions: metav1.NewDeleteOptions(0)},

	t.Helper()
	actualPDB := ps.Get(key)
	actualConditions := actualPDB.Status.Conditions
	actualPDB.Status.Conditions = nil
	expectedStatus := policy.PodDisruptionBudgetStatus{
		DisruptionsAllowed: disruptionsAllowed,
		CurrentHealthy:     currentHealthy,
		DesiredHealthy:     desiredHealthy,

default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.\n\nIfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless...