assertEquals(SmbComTransaction.TRANSACTION_BUF_SIZE, buffer2.length, "Reused buffer should have correct size");

        // Note: We don't check if content is cleared as that's not a security requirement
        // The important part is that the buffer is valid and has correct size
    }

    /**
     * Test getBuffers method for transaction buffers.
     */
    @Test

			pools:          pools,
			name:           "Correct",
			expectedErr:    false,
			expectedUpdate: false,
		},
		{
			meta:           meta,
			pools:          newPools,
			name:           "Correct-Update",
			expectedErr:    false,
			expectedUpdate: true,
		},
		{
			meta:           meta,
			pools:          reducedPools,
			name:           "Correct-Update",
			expectedErr:    false,

import org.codelibs.fess.unit.UnitFessTestCase;

public class FessWebResourceRootTest extends UnitFessTestCase {

    public void test_classExists() {
        // Basic test to verify the class exists and has the correct structure
        assertNotNull("FessWebResourceRoot class should exist", FessWebResourceRoot.class);
    }

    public void test_inheritance() {
        // Verify that FessWebResourceRoot extends StandardRoot

					t.Fatalf("column id primary key should be correct, name: %v, column: %#v", columnType.Name(),
						columnType)
				}
			case "name":
				dataType := DB.Dialector.DataTypeOf(stmt.Schema.LookUpField(columnType.Name()))
				if !strings.Contains(strings.ToUpper(dataType), strings.ToUpper(columnType.DatabaseTypeName())) {
					t.Fatalf("column name type should be correct, name: %v, length: %v, expects: %v, column: %#v",

        String result = purgeDocJob.execute();

        // Assert deleteByQuery was called
        assertTrue(deleteByQueryCalled);

        // Assert correct index was used
        assertEquals("fess.update", deleteIndex);

        // Assert query builder is correct
        assertNotNull(deleteQuery);
        assertTrue(deleteQuery instanceof RangeQueryBuilder);

The correct place is:

* In the key `content`, that has as value another JSON object (`dict`) that contains:
    * A key with the media type, e.g. `application/json`, that contains as value another JSON object, that contains:
        * A key `schema`, that has as the value the JSON Schema from the model, here's the correct place.

        }
    }

    public void test_name() {
        // Test name() method returns correct string representation
        assertEquals("METADATA", SsoResponseType.METADATA.name());
        assertEquals("LOGOUT", SsoResponseType.LOGOUT.name());
    }

    public void test_ordinal() {
        // Test ordinal() method returns correct position
        assertEquals(0, SsoResponseType.METADATA.ordinal());

        assertEquals(32, derived1.length, "Derived key should have correct length");
        assertEquals(32, derived2.length, "Derived key should have correct length");
        assertEquals(32, derived3.length, "Derived key should have correct length");

        assertFalse(Arrays.equals(derived1, derived2), "Different labels should produce different keys");

Of course, the attackers would not try all this by hand, they would write a program to do it, possibly with thousands or millions of tests per second. And they would get just one extra correct letter at a time.

But doing that, in some minutes or hours the attackers would have guessed the correct username and password, with the "help" of our application, just using the time taken to answer.

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

public class FessActionValidatorTest extends UnitFessTestCase {

    public void test_constructor() {
        // Test basic class structure without complex mocking
        assertEquals("FessActionValidator should be in correct package", "org.codelibs.fess.validation.FessActionValidator",
                FessActionValidator.class.getName());
    }

    public void test_inheritance() {