Those worker processes would be the ones running your application, they would perform the main computations to receive a **request** and return a **response**, and they would load anything you put in variables in RAM.

<img src="/img/deployment/concepts/process-ram.svg">

    computationLatch.countDown();
    // let some computations complete
    while (computedCount.get() < nThreads) {
      Thread.yield();
    }
    cache.invalidateAll();
    tasksFinished.await();

    // Check all of the removal notifications we received: they should have had correctly-associated
    // keys and values. (An earlier bug saw removal notifications for in-progress computations,
    // which had real keys with null values.)

   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache
   * at a time, but since read operations and cache loading computations can proceed concurrently,
   * this still yields higher concurrency than full synchronization.
   *
   * <p>Defaults to 4. <b>Note:</b>The default may change in the future. If you care about this

      }
    }.start();

    getStartedSignal.await();

    // computation is in progress; asMap shouldn't have changed
    assertEquals(1, map.size());
    assertFalse(map.containsKey(getKey));
    assertSame(refreshKey, map.get(refreshKey));

    // let computation complete
    letGetFinishSignal.countDown();
    getFinishedSignal.await();
    checkNothingLogged();

.concat([fragments[divider].split(splitRegex)[0]]),\n        [fragments[divider].split(splitRegex)[1]].concat(\n          fragments.slice(divider + 1)\n        ),\n      ]\n    : [fragments];\n\n  // Convert the values with units to absolute pixels to allow our computations\n  ops = ops.map((op, index) => {\n    // Most of the units rely on the orientation of the popper\n    const measurement = (index === 1 ? !useHeight : useHeight)\n      ? 'height'\n      : 'width';\n    let mergeWithPrevious = false;\n    return...

   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache
   * at a time, but since read operations and cache loading computations can proceed concurrently,
   * this still yields higher concurrency than full synchronization.
   *
   * <p>Defaults to 4. <b>Note:</b>The default may change in the future. If you care about this

  * Note that NumPy's type promotion rules have been changed(See [NEP 50](https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0050-scalar-promotion.html#nep50)for details). This may change the precision at which computations happen, leading either to type errors or to numerical changes to results.

   *   <li>To get uninterruptibility and remove checked exceptions, use {@link
   *       Futures#getUnchecked}.
   * </ul>
   *
   * @throws ExecutionException if the computation threw an exception
   * @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @ParametricNullness
  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getUninterruptibly(Future<V> future)

// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

#include "../../../../../runtime/textflag.h"

TEXT asmtest(SB),DUPOK|NOSPLIT,$0
start:
	//
	// Unprivileged ISA
	//

	// 2.4: Integer Computational Instructions

	ADDI	$2047, X5				// 9382f27f
	ADDI	$-2048, X5				// 93820280
	ADDI	$2048, X5				// 9382024093820240
	ADDI	$-2049, X5				// 938202c09382f2bf
	ADDI	$4094, X5				// 9382f27f9382f27f

   *   <li>To get uninterruptibility and remove checked exceptions, use {@link
   *       Futures#getUnchecked}.
   * </ul>
   *
   * @throws ExecutionException if the computation threw an exception
   * @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @ParametricNullness
  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getUninterruptibly(Future<V> future)