Use `Objects.requireNonNull` statement or `Preconditions` rather than `assert` or `@SuppressWarning` annotation to suppress if possible.

For gradual adoption, enable checks project-by-project.
Do not rely on `@NullMarked` annotations.
Only enable checks for a project if all its dependencies have checks enabled, in order to avoid back-and-forth when refining the annotations.

But you might want to still keep the return type annotation in the function to get the support from tools like editors and type checkers (e.g. mypy).

In this case, you can disable the response model generation by setting `response_model=None`:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_05_py310.py hl[7] *}

## Используем экземпляр как зависимость { #use-the-instance-as-a-dependency }

Затем мы можем использовать этот `checker` в `Depends(checker)` вместо `Depends(FixedContentQueryChecker)`, потому что зависимостью является экземпляр `checker`, а не сам класс.

И при разрешении зависимости **FastAPI** вызовет `checker` примерно так:

```Python
checker(q="somequery")

    def __call__(self, q: str = ""):
        if q:
            return self.fixed_content in q
        return False


checker = FixedContentQueryChecker("bar")


@app.get("/query-checker/")
async def read_query_check(fixed_content_included: bool = Depends(checker)):

## Utilize a instância como dependência { #use-the-instance-as-a-dependency }

Então, nós podemos utilizar este `checker` em um `Depends(checker)`, no lugar de `Depends(FixedContentQueryChecker)`, porque a dependência é a instância, `checker`, e não a própria classe.

E quando a dependência for resolvida, o **FastAPI** chamará este `checker` como:

```Python
checker(q="somequery")

# only on affected targets, usually. There are targets in //tensorflow/lite that
# don't pass --nobuild, so they're on their own.
#
# Although buildifier checks for formatting as well, "bazel build nobuild"
# checks for cross-file issues like bad includes or missing BUILD definitions.
#
# We can't test on the windows toolchains because they're using a legacy

    "path,expected_status,expected_response",
    [
        (
            "/query-checker/",
            200,
            {"fixed_content_in_query": False},
        ),
        (
            "/query-checker/?q=qwerty",
            200,
            {"fixed_content_in_query": False},
        ),
        (
            "/query-checker/?q=foobar",
            200,
            {"fixed_content_in_query": True},
        ),

          <item index="10" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.compatqual.NullableDecl" />
          <item index="11" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.compatqual.NullableType" />
          <item index="12" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable" />

## Die Instanz als Abhängigkeit verwenden { #use-the-instance-as-a-dependency }

Dann könnten wir diesen `checker` in einem `Depends(checker)` anstelle von `Depends(FixedContentQueryChecker)` verwenden, da die Abhängigkeit die Instanz `checker` und nicht die Klasse selbst ist.

Und beim Auflösen der Abhängigkeit ruft **FastAPI** diesen `checker` wie folgt auf:

```Python

## Usar la instance como una dependencia { #use-the-instance-as-a-dependency }

Luego, podríamos usar este `checker` en un `Depends(checker)`, en lugar de `Depends(FixedContentQueryChecker)`, porque la dependencia es la instance, `checker`, no la clase en sí.

Y al resolver la dependencia, **FastAPI** llamará a este `checker` así:

```Python
checker(q="somequery")
```