TestAuthenticationChain chain2 = new TestAuthenticationChain();
        TestAuthenticationChain chain3 = new TestAuthenticationChain();

        chain1.loadResult = user1;
        chain2.loadResult = user2;
        chain3.loadResult = user3;

        authenticationManager.addChain(chain1);
        authenticationManager.addChain(chain2);

        User u = user;
        for (final AuthenticationChain chain : chains) {
            u = chain.load(u);
        }
        return u;
    }

    /**
     * Adds an authentication chain to the manager.
     * @param chain The authentication chain to add.
     */
    public void addChain(final AuthenticationChain chain) {
        chains = ArrayUtils.addAll(chains, chain);
    }

    /**

    assertFailsToDecode(base64(), "Wf2!", "Unrecognized character: !");
    // This sentence just isn't base64() encoded.
    assertFailsToDecode(base64(), "let's not talk of love or chains!");
    // A 4n+1 length string is never legal base64().
    assertFailsToDecode(base64(), "12345", "Invalid input length 5");
    // These have a combination of invalid length, unrecognized characters and wrong padding.

        FilterChain chain = createDefaultFilterChain();
        for (final Filter element : filterList) {
            chain = appendFilterChain(element, chain);
        }
        filterChain = chain;
    }

    /**
     * Appends a filter to an existing filter chain.
     *
     * @param filter the filter to append
     * @param chain the existing filter chain to append to

    assertFailsToDecode(base64(), "Wf2!", "Unrecognized character: !");
    // This sentence just isn't base64() encoded.
    assertFailsToDecode(base64(), "let's not talk of love or chains!");
    // A 4n+1 length string is never legal base64().
    assertFailsToDecode(base64(), "12345", "Invalid input length 5");
    // These have a combination of invalid length, unrecognized characters and wrong padding.

/**
 * Enhanced Pre-Authentication Integrity Service for SMB 3.1.1.
 *
 * Provides comprehensive pre-authentication integrity protection against
 * downgrade attacks by maintaining cryptographic hash chains of all
 * negotiation and session setup messages.
 */
public class PreauthIntegrityService {

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(PreauthIntegrityService.class);

        assertEquals(block.useUnicode, next.useUnicode, "useUnicode must be propagated");
        assertTrue(next.writeParamCalls > 0, "chained SMB parameter words should be written");
        assertTrue(next.writeBytesCalls > 0, "chained SMB bytes should be written");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("decode basic AndX block with no chaining")
    void testDecodeBasicNoAndx() {

        this.mid = mid;
    }

    /**
     * Chains another message to this message for compound operations.
     *
     * @param n the message to chain
     * @return whether chaining was successful
     */
    public boolean chain(final ServerMessageBlock2 n) {
        if (this.next != null) {
            return this.next.chain(n);
        }

        n.addFlags(SMB2_FLAGS_RELATED_OPERATIONS);

import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A {@link ListenableFuture} that supports fluent chains of operations. For example:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * ListenableFuture<Boolean> adminIsLoggedIn =
 *     FluentFuture.from(usersDatabase.getAdminUser())
 *         .transform(User::getId, directExecutor())

   *   <li>The {@link Predicate} returned by this method catches {@link ClassCastException} and
   *       {@link NullPointerException}.
   *   <li>Code that chains multiple predicates together (especially negations) may be more readable
   *       using this method. For example, {@code not(in(target))} is generally more readable than
   *       {@code not(target::contains)}.