@GwtCompatible
@ReflectionSupport(value = ReflectionSupport.Level.FULL)
// Some Android 5.0.x Samsung devices have bugs in JDK reflection APIs that cause
// getDeclaredField to throw a NoSuchFieldException when the field is definitely there.
// Since this class only needs CAS on one field, we can avoid this bug by extending AtomicReference
// instead of using an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater. This reference stores Thread instances

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible

        continue;
      }
      if (
      /*
       * At least one of the classes nested inside TypeResolverTest triggers a bug under older JDKs:
       * https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215328 -> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215470
       * https://github.com/google/guava/blob/4f12c5891a7adedbaa1d99fc9f77d8cc4e9da206/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/reflect/TypeResolverTest.java#L201

    // javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No new session is allowed and no existing
    // session can be resumed
    //
    // Report https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8264944
    // Sessions improvement https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8245576
    if (!platform.isJdk9() && !platform.isOpenJsse() && !platform.isJdk8Alpn()) {
      reuseSession = true
    }

      /*
       * The subList() docs claim that this should be an
       * IndexOutOfBoundsException, but many JDK implementations throw
       * IllegalArgumentException:
       * https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-4506427
       */
    }
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("EmptyList") // ImmutableList doesn't support nullable element types
  public void testSubList_empty() {

  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testCreateWithNull_unsupported()} so that tests
   * can suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-5045147">JDK-5045147</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getCreateWithNullUnsupportedMethod() {

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible

   * tests of {@link CopyOnWriteArraySet} can suppress it with {@code
   * FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6570575">JDK-6570575</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getListIteratorFullyModifiableMethod() {

  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testCreateWithNull_unsupported()} so that tests
   * can suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-5045147">JDK-5045147</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getCreateWithNullUnsupportedMethod() {