/**
   * Do interruptible work here - do not complete Futures here, as their listeners could be
   * interrupted.
   */
  @ParametricNullness
  abstract T runInterruptibly() throws Exception;

  /**
   * Any interruption that happens as a result of calling interruptTask will arrive before this
   * method is called. Complete Futures here.
   */

## Return the same input data { #return-the-same-input-data }

Here we are declaring a `UserIn` model, it will contain a plaintext password:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[7,9] *}

/// info

            andx.uid = uid;
            dstIndex += ((AndXServerMessageBlock) andx).writeAndXWireFormat(dst, dstIndex);
        } else {
            // the andx smb is not of type andx so lets just write it here and
            // were done.
            final int andxStart = dstIndex;
            andx.wordCount = andx.writeParameterWordsWireFormat(dst, dstIndex);
            dstIndex += andx.wordCount + 1;
            andx.wordCount /= 2;

* Then it returns the **response**.

/// note | Technical Details

If you have dependencies with `yield`, the exit code will run *after* the middleware.

If there were any background tasks (covered in the [Background Tasks](background-tasks.md){.internal-link target=_blank} section, you will see it later), they will run *after* all the middleware.

///

Let's create a dependency `get_current_user`.

Remember that dependencies can have sub-dependencies?

`get_current_user` will have a dependency with the same `oauth2_scheme` we created before.

The same as we were doing before in the *path operation* directly, our new dependency `get_current_user` will receive a `token` as a `str` from the sub-dependency `oauth2_scheme`:

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial002_an_py310.py hl[25] *}

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as

        if (dgst != null && !isAsync() && (getConfig().isRequireSecureNegotiate() || getErrorCode() == NtStatus.NT_STATUS_SUCCESS)) {
            // MID checking not required here as we only read responses for which we're waiting
            // We only read what we were waiting for, so first guess would be no.
            final boolean verify = dgst.verify(buffer, i, size, 0, this);
            this.verifyFailed = verify;
            return !verify;

* Nginx
* HAProxy

## Let's Encrypt { #lets-encrypt }

Before Let's Encrypt, these **HTTPS certificates** were sold by trusted third parties.

The process to acquire one of these certificates used to be cumbersome, require quite some paperwork and the certificates were quite expensive.

But then **<a href="https://letsencrypt.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Let's Encrypt</a>** was created.

         */
        FILE_MODIFIED,
        /**
         * Directory was renamed
         */
        DIRECTORY_RENAMED,
        /**
         * File or directory attributes were changed
         */
        ATTRIBUTES_CHANGED
    }

    /**
     * SMB2 File Action constants
     */
    private static final int FILE_ACTION_ADDED = 0x00000001;

have to make sure that it's a single process running those previous steps *even* if afterwards, you start **multiple processes** (multiple workers) for the application itself. If those steps were run by **multiple processes**, they would **duplicate** the work by running it in **parallel**, and if the steps were something delicate like a database migration, they could cause conflicts with each other.

Of course, there are some cases where there's no problem in running the previous steps multiple...