future.setFuture(delegate);
    future.addListener(inBetween, directExecutor());
    delegate.set(1);
    future.addListener(after, directExecutor());

    before.assertRun();
    inBetween.assertRun();
    after.assertRun();
  }

  public void testListenLaterSetAsynchronouslyLaterDelegateFailed() {
    CountingRunnable before = new CountingRunnable();
    CountingRunnable inBetween = new CountingRunnable();

    check(rule.startsWith(WILDCARD_CHAR)) {
      """Wildcard Assertion Failure: '$rule'
A wildcard rule was added with a wildcard that is not in leftmost position! We'll need to change the ${PublicSuffixDatabase::class.java.name} to handle this."""
    }
    check(rule.indexOf(WILDCARD_CHAR, 1) == -1) {
      """Wildcard Assertion Failure: '$rule'

  /** Annotates a public method that declares subtype assertion. */
  @RequiredModifiers(Modifier.PUBLIC)
  @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
  @Target(ElementType.METHOD)
  @Keep
  @interface TestSubtype {
    /** Suppresses the assertion on {@link TypeToken#getSubtype}. */
    boolean suppressGetSubtype() default false;

    /** Suppresses the assertion on {@link TypeToken#getSupertype}. */

     * and to provide a basic check of its values.
     * Since it's an interface with only static final fields, there is no complex logic to test.
     */
    @Test
    void testConstants() {
        // A simple assertion to verify that some of the constants have the expected values.
        // This confirms that the class is on the classpath and its fields are accessible.

    // We use this somewhat weird pattern with an enum for each assertion we want to make as a way
    // of dealing with the fact that one of the assertions is @GwtIncompatible but we don't want to
    // have to have duplicate @GwtIncompatible test methods just to make that assertion.
    for (AssertFailsToDecodeStrategy strategy : AssertFailsToDecodeStrategy.values()) {

        assertEquals("com.example|jcifs|org.test", System.getProperty("java.protocol.handler.pkgs"));
    }

    // Helper method to get the singleton instance via reflection for assertion
    private Object getSingletonInstanceViaReflection() {
        try {
            Field instance = SingletonContext.class.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE");
            instance.setAccessible(true);

    // is cancelled.
    future1.cancel(false);

    // Give the second task a chance to (incorrectly) start up while the first task is running.
    // (This is the assertion that fails.)
    assertThat(future2.isDone()).isFalse();

    // Stop the first task. The second task should then run.
    blockingCallable.stop();
    executor.shutdown();

            assertNull(e.getCause());
        }
    }

    public void test_throwAndCatchWithCause() {
        // Test throwing and catching the exception with cause
        String expectedMessage = "SAML assertion validation failed";
        Exception expectedCause = new IllegalStateException("Invalid SAML response");

        try {
            throw new SsoProcessException(expectedMessage, expectedCause);

    // cheats and does not attempt every possible permutation. Instead, it only considers wildcards
    // in the leftmost position. We assert this fact when we generate the public suffix file. If
    // this assertion ever fails we'll need to refactor this implementation.
    var wildcardMatch: String? = null
    if (domainLabelsUtf8Bytes.size > 1) {
      val labelsWithWildcard = domainLabelsUtf8Bytes.clone()

 *
 * @param <K> the type of keys used by the maps under test
 * @param <V> the type of mapped values used the maps under test
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
// TODO: Descriptive assertion messages, with hints as to probable fixes.
// TODO: Add another constructor parameter indicating whether the class under test is ordered, and
// check the order if so.
// TODO: Refactor to share code with SetTestBuilder etc.