// Test 32 byte arrays of ascending.
    byte[] ascending = new byte[32];
    for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
      ascending[i] = (byte) i;
    }
    assertCrc(0x46dd794e, ascending);
  }

  public void testDescending() {
    // Test 32 byte arrays of descending.
    byte[] descending = new byte[32];
    for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
      descending[i] = (byte) (31 - i);
    }

permissions: {}

jobs:
  stale:
    permissions:
      pull-requests: write

    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/stale@v10
        with:
          operations-per-run: 50
          ascending: true
          exempt-all-milestones: true

          # ISSUES (deactivated) ----------------------------------------------
          # This workflow should touch no issues, so times are set to -1

  /**
   * Returns a {@code TopKSelector} that collects the lowest {@code k} elements added to it,
   * relative to the natural ordering of the elements, and returns them via {@link #topK} in
   * ascending order.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k < 0} or {@code k > Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2}
   */
  public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> TopKSelector<T> least(int k) {

// object should be returned by ObjectLayer.Walk method
type WalkVersionsSortOrder uint8

const (
	// WalkVersionsSortAsc - Sort in ascending order of ModTime
	WalkVersionsSortAsc WalkVersionsSortOrder = iota
	// WalkVersionsSortDesc - Sort in descending order of ModTime
	WalkVersionsSortDesc
)

// ObjectOptions represents object options for ObjectLayer object operations
type ObjectOptions struct {

        return ComponentUtil.getQueryProcessor();
    }

    /**
     * Creates a sort builder for the specified field and order.
     * @param field The field name to sort by.
     * @param order The sort order (ascending or descending).
     * @return The appropriate sort builder for the field.
     */
    protected SortBuilder<?> createFieldSortBuilder(final String field, final SortOrder order) {

                    "Dialect " + String.format("0x%04X", dialect) + " should be >= SMB 2.0.2");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Dialects should be in ascending order")
        void testDialectOrdering() {
            assertTrue(Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0202 < Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0210, "SMB 2.0.2 should be less than SMB 2.1");

  abstract int indexFor(Object key);

  /** Returns the total number of stripes in this instance. */
  public abstract int size();

  /**
   * Returns the stripes that correspond to the passed objects, in ascending (as per {@link
   * #getAt(int)}) order. Thus, threads that use the stripes in the order returned by this method
   * are guaranteed to not deadlock each other.
   *

	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("%s: <ERROR> %s", instanceType, err)
	}

	var opts ObjectOptions
	uploadContent := "The list of parts was not in ascending order. The parts list must be specified in order by part number."
	length := int64(len(uploadContent))

     * exactly matching hash codes, which would cause construction to take O(n^2), but can't detect
     * e.g. hash codes adversarially designed to go into ascending table locations, which keeps
     * construction O(n) (as desired) but then can have O(n) queries later.
     *
     * <p>If this returns false, then no query can take more than O(log n).
     *

    // Plug the following UnicodeSet pattern into
    // https://unicode.org/cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp
    // [[:Nd:]&[:nv=0:]&[\u0000-\uFFFF]]
    // and get the zeroes from there.

    // Must be in ascending order.
    private static final String ZEROES =
        "0\u0660\u06f0\u07c0\u0966\u09e6\u0a66\u0ae6\u0b66\u0be6\u0c66\u0ce6\u0d66\u0de6"