- Sort Score
- Num 10 results
- Language All
Results 1 - 10 of 505 for We (0.01 seconds)
-
AI_POLICY.md
2. **Thoughtful, honest feedback.** We will consider every contribution on its merits, regardless of whether AI was used. We may not respond quickly—our review queue is long—but we will tell you clearly what works, what needs to change, and why.
Created: Wed Apr 01 11:36:16 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Fri Mar 27 18:43:39 GMT 2026 - 3.1K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/tutorial/extra-models.md
So, if we create a Pydantic object `user_in` like: ```Python user_in = UserIn(username="john", password="secret", email="******@****.***") ``` and then we call: ```Python user_dict = user_in.model_dump() ``` we now have a `dict` with the data in the variable `user_dict` (it's a `dict` instead of a Pydantic model object). And if we call: ```Python print(user_dict) ```
Created: Sun Apr 05 07:19:11 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Thu Mar 05 18:13:19 GMT 2026 - 6.7K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/advanced/security/oauth2-scopes.md
We verify that we get a `username`, and extract the scopes. And then we validate that data with the Pydantic model (catching the `ValidationError` exception), and if we get an error reading the JWT token or validating the data with Pydantic, we raise the `HTTPException` we created before. For that, we update the Pydantic model `TokenData` with a new property `scopes`.
Created: Sun Apr 05 07:19:11 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Thu Mar 05 18:13:19 GMT 2026 - 13.4K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/tutorial/sql-databases.md
Now that we have **multiple models**, we can update the parts of the app that use them. We receive in the request a `HeroCreate` *data model*, and from it, we create a `Hero` *table model*. This new *table model* `Hero` will have the fields sent by the client, and will also have an `id` generated by the database.
Created: Sun Apr 05 07:19:11 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sat Mar 07 09:29:03 GMT 2026 - 15.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/tutorial/bigger-applications.md
/// We are going to include this `APIRouter` in the main `FastAPI` app, but first, let's check the dependencies and another `APIRouter`. ## Dependencies { #dependencies } We see that we are going to need some dependencies used in several places of the application. So we put them in their own `dependencies` module (`app/dependencies.py`).
Created: Sun Apr 05 07:19:11 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sat Mar 07 09:29:03 GMT 2026 - 19.2K bytes - Click Count (0) -
architecture/standards/0002-avoid-using-java-serialization.md
## Decision We do not use Java serialization. Instead, we use custom serialization where we explicitly describe how data objects should be serialized and deserialized. For internal purposes, we use binary formats for their brevity. We use the `Serializer` abstraction to separate the actual implementation of serialization from its uses. When sharing data with external tools, we use JSON. ## Consequences
Created: Wed Apr 01 11:36:16 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Thu Mar 05 14:05:45 GMT 2026 - 2.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/advanced/path-operation-advanced-configuration.md
Then we use the request directly, and extract the body as `bytes`. This means that FastAPI won't even try to parse the request payload as JSON. And then in our code, we parse that YAML content directly, and then we are again using the same Pydantic model to validate the YAML content:
Created: Sun Apr 05 07:19:11 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Thu Mar 05 18:13:19 GMT 2026 - 7.1K bytes - Click Count (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/util/concurrent/AbstractFutureFallbackAtomicHelperTest.java
* when we run AbstractFutureTest itself. */ /* * We don't test UnsafeAtomicHelper here, since guava-android doesn't provide a way to use it * under the JVM. (We could arrange for one if we really wanted, but that will break once the * JDK further restricts access to Unsafe.) But we have coverage under an Android emulator,Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sat Mar 07 02:20:33 GMT 2026 - 8.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
build-logic-commons/gradle-plugin/src/main/kotlin/gradlebuild.code-quality.gradle.kts
"PatternMatchingInstanceof", // We should enable this. "StatementSwitchToExpressionSwitch", // We should enable this. "StringConcatToTextBlock", // We should enable this. "ClassCanBeStatic", // We should enable this. // DISCUSS "EnumOrdinal", // This violation is ubiquitous, though most are benign. "EqualsGetClass", // Let's agree if we want to adopt Error Prone's idea of valid equals()
Created: Wed Apr 01 11:36:16 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Wed Mar 11 22:47:14 GMT 2026 - 8.7K bytes - Click Count (0) -
architecture/standards/0003-avoid-introducing-Groovy-types-to-public-api.md
- **Reduce the size of the Gradle distribution** - We no longer need to carry multiple standard libraries for different languages. ## Decision We do not introduce new public API methods that include Groovy types in their signatures. Existing Groovy methods will not be removed immediately. ## Consequences * If we would have used `Closure`, we must instead use `Action<T>`, `Spec<T>`, `Callable<T>`, or `Transformer<OUT, IN>`.
Created: Wed Apr 01 11:36:16 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Thu Mar 05 12:39:41 GMT 2026 - 1.8K bytes - Click Count (0)