return repository.isOverride(method)
    }

    Violation acceptOrReject(JApiCompatibility member, Violation rejection) {
        List<String> changes = member.compatibilityChanges.collect { Violation.describe(it.getType()) }
        return acceptOrReject(member, changes, rejection)
    }

    Violation acceptOrReject(JApiCompatibility member, List<String> changes, Violation rejection) {

        assertFalse(violations.isEmpty());
        assertEquals(1, violations.size());

        ConstraintViolation<CustomMessageBean> violation = violations.iterator().next();
        assertEquals("Invalid cron expression format", violation.getMessage());
    }

    // Test annotation on method parameter
    @Test
    public void test_annotationOnMethod() throws Exception {

    OkHttpClient()

    assertThat(violations).hasSize(1)
    assertThat(violations[0].message).isEqualTo("newSSLContext")
  }

  @Test
  fun testNewCall() {
    Platform.resetForTests()

    val client = OkHttpClient()

    applyStrictMode()

    // Safe on main
    client.newCall(Request("https://google.com/robots.txt".toHttpUrl()))

    assertThat(violations).isEmpty()
  }

        "StringConcatToTextBlock", // We should enable this.
        "ClassCanBeStatic", // We should enable this.

        // DISCUSS
        "EnumOrdinal", // This violation is ubiquitous, though most are benign.
        "EqualsGetClass", // Let's agree if we want to adopt Error Prone's idea of valid equals()

    }

    @Test
    public void test_constructorWithThrowableCause_AssertionError() {
        // Test with AssertionError as cause
        String message = "SSO login assertion violation";
        AssertionError error = new AssertionError("Security assertion failed");
        SsoLoginException exception = new SsoLoginException(message, error);

        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());

    HashCode hashCodeB = HashCode.fromBytes(bytesB);

    // They aren't equal...
    assertFalse(hashCodeA.equals(hashCodeB));

    // But they still have the same Object#hashCode() value.
    // Technically not a violation of the equals/hashCode contract, but...?
    assertEquals(hashCodeA.hashCode(), hashCodeB.hashCode());
  }

  public void testRoundTripHashCodeUsingFromString() {
    HashCode hash1 = sha1().hashString("foo", US_ASCII);

    HashCode hashCodeB = HashCode.fromBytes(bytesB);

    // They aren't equal...
    assertFalse(hashCodeA.equals(hashCodeB));

    // But they still have the same Object#hashCode() value.
    // Technically not a violation of the equals/hashCode contract, but...?
    assertEquals(hashCodeA.hashCode(), hashCodeB.hashCode());
  }

  public void testRoundTripHashCodeUsingFromString() {
    HashCode hash1 = sha1().hashString("foo", US_ASCII);

                    `response_model`, converting any data as necessary to generate the
                    corresponding JSON. But if the data in the object returned is not
                    valid, that would mean a violation of the contract with the client,
                    so it's an error from the API developer. So, FastAPI will raise an
                    error and return a 500 error code (Internal Server Error).

                    `response_model`, converting any data as necessary to generate the
                    corresponding JSON. But if the data in the object returned is not
                    valid, that would mean a violation of the contract with the client,
                    so it's an error from the API developer. So, FastAPI will raise an
                    error and return a 500 error code (Internal Server Error).

*   Fixes segfault raised by calling session-only ops in eager mode,
    ([CVE-2020-15204](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-15204))
*   Fixes data leak and potential ASLR violation from `tf.raw_ops.StringNGrams`,
    ([CVE-2020-15205](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-15205))
*   Fixes segfaults caused by incomplete `SavedModel` validation,