// do n swaps, minus a delta (0 or 2 for Reversal, gcd(d, n) for Successive), so that's about
    // twice as many reads and writes. But benchmarking shows that they usually perform better than
    // Dolphin. Reversal is about as good as Successive on average, and it is much simpler,
    // especially since we already have a `reverse` method.
    checkNotNull(array);

        }
        return directive.allows(path);
    }

    /**
     * Gets the crawl delay value for the specified user agent from robots.txt.
     * The crawl delay specifies the time (in seconds) to wait between successive requests.
     *
     * @param userAgent The user agent string to match against robots.txt directives
     * @return The crawl delay value in seconds. Returns 0 if no matching directive is found

import com.google.j2objc.annotations.J2ObjCIncompatible;
import java.time.Duration;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;

/**
 * An object that accurately measures <i>elapsed time</i>: the measured duration between two
 * successive readings of "now" in the same process.
 *
 * <p>In contrast, <i>wall time</i> is a reading of "now" as given by a method like
 * {@link System#currentTimeMillis()}, best represented as an {@link java.time.Instant}. Such values

labels.search_result_status_over=Risultati di ricerca per <b>{0}</b><span class="br-phone"></span> circa <b>{1}</b> o più <b>{2}</b> - <b>{3}</b>
labels.search_result_time=({0} secondi)
labels.prev_page=Precedente
labels.next_page=Successivo
labels.did_not_match=Nessuna informazione corrispondente a <b>{0}</b> è stata trovata.
labels.search_title=Fess
labels.search_popular_word_word=Parole popolari:
labels.search_related_queries=Parole correlate: