if label.name == "lang-all":
                is_lang = True
                break
        for review in pr.reviews.nodes:
            if review.author:
                authors[review.author.login] = review.author
                if is_lang:
                    translation_reviewers[review.author.login] += 1
        if pr.state == "MERGED" and pr.author:
            if is_lang:

* Add the specific language label.
* Add the label `awaiting-review`.

The label `awaiting-review` is special, only used for translations. A GitHub Action will detect it, then it will read the language label, and it will update the GitHub Discussions managing the translations for that language to notify people that there's a new translation to review.

issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If we decide to pursue a feature request, it will go through a thorough process
of API design and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/API
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues

Pull requests
-------------

* **Easier onboarding**: New contributors have clear guidance on which spelling to use
* **Better searchability**: Finding code and documentation becomes more predictable
* **Reduced review friction**: Less time spent on spelling corrections during PR reviews
* **Professional appearance**: Consistent APIs and documentation appear more polished
* **Clearer contribution guidelines**: [CONTRIBUTING.md](../../CONTRIBUTING.md) now includes this requirement

# consult https://www.iana.org/time-zones for the latest versions,
# update CODE and DATA below, and then run
#
#	./update.bash -commit
#
# That will prepare the files and create the commit.
#
# To review such a commit (as the reviewer), use:
#
#	git codereview change NNNNNN   # CL number
#	cd lib/time
#	./update.bash
#
# If it prints "No updates needed.", then the generated files

Me encanta escuchar cómo se está utilizando **FastAPI**, qué te ha gustado, en qué proyecto/empresa lo estás usando, etc.

## Vota por FastAPI { #vote-for-fastapi }

* <a href="https://www.slant.co/options/34241/~fastapi-review" class="external-link" target="_blank">Vota por **FastAPI** en Slant</a>.
* <a href="https://alternativeto.net/software/fastapi/about/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Vota por **FastAPI** en AlternativeTo</a>.

    img: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/render.svg
  - url: https://www.coderabbit.ai/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_medium=badge&utm_campaign=fastapi
    title: Cut Code Review Time & Bugs in Half with CodeRabbit
    img: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/coderabbit.png
  - url: https://subtotal.com/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_medium=sponsorship&utm_campaign=open-source

from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Union, cast

import httpx
from github import Github
from pydantic import BaseModel, SecretStr
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings

awaiting_label = "awaiting-review"
lang_all_label = "lang-all"
approved_label = "approved-1"


github_graphql_url = "https://api.github.com/graphql"
questions_translations_category_id = "DIC_kwDOCZduT84CT5P9"

all_discussions_query = """

        <span class="sponsor-badge">sponsor</span>
        <img class="sponsor-image" src="/img/sponsors/render-banner.svg" />
      </a>
    </div>
    <div class="item">
      <a title="Cut Code Review Time & Bugs in Half with CodeRabbit" style="display: block; position: relative;" href="https://www.coderabbit.ai/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=fastapi" target="_blank">
        <span class="sponsor-badge">sponsor</span>

We may ask you to answer these questions directly in the GitHub issue or (for large changes) in a shared Google Doc.

Please note that some features may be out of the team's current focus, and it can take significant time for the team to review the PR thoroughly and address it fully.

### Security vulnerabilities