</component>
	<component name="gsaConfigParser" class="org.codelibs.fess.util.GsaConfigParser" instance="prototype">
	</component>
	<component name="queryStringBuilder" class="org.codelibs.fess.util.QueryStringBuilder" instance="prototype">
	</component>
	<component name="queryParser" class="org.codelibs.fess.query.parser.QueryParser">
	</component>

<components namespace="fessCrawler">
	<include path="crawler/container.xml" />
	<include path="crawler/transformer.xml" />

	<component name="ruleManager" class="org.codelibs.fess.crawler.rule.impl.RuleManagerImpl" instance="prototype">
		<postConstruct name="addRule">
			<arg>sitemapsRule</arg>
		</postConstruct>
		<postConstruct name="addRule">
			<arg>webHtmlRule</arg>
		</postConstruct>
		<postConstruct name="addRule">

Internal properties MUST NOT be documented in public documentation.

As a *secondary aspect*, property names can carry **feature-stability** information of the features they represent.
As features progress through the lifecycle of early prototype, incubation, and stabilization, their corresponding properties may also be updated.

Examples as of Gradle 9.3.0:

* `org.gradle.internal.operations.trace` – internal property

	</component>

	<!-- Jobs -->
	<component name="crawlJob" class="org.codelibs.fess.job.CrawlJob" instance="prototype">
	</component>
	<component name="suggestJob" class="org.codelibs.fess.job.SuggestJob" instance="prototype">
	</component>
	<component name="aggregateLogJob" class="org.codelibs.fess.job.AggregateLogJob" instance="prototype">
	</component>

                 * the map to change between that call and this one. But if that happens, the
                 * behavior is undefined because of the concurrent mutation.)
                 *
                 * (Our prototype checker happens to be "smart" enough to understand this for the
                 * *get* call in getValue but not for the *put* call here.)
                 *

;o<t;o++)n[o-1]=arguments[o];return new e(...n)});const u=D(Array.prototype.forEach),m=D(Array.prototype.lastIndexOf),p=D(Array.prototype.pop),f=D(Array.prototype.push),d=D(Array.prototype.splice),h=D(String.prototype.toLowerCase),g=D(String.prototype.toString),T=D(String.prototype.match),y=D(String.prototype.replace),E=D(String.prototype.indexOf),A=D(String.prototype.trim),_=D(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty),b=D(RegExp.prototype.test),S=(N=TypeError,function(){for(var e=arguments.length,t=new ...

"use strict";var G=Object.defineProperty;var Te=Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor;var Oe=Object.getOwnPropertyNames;var we=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;var ye=(l,e)=>{for(var t in e)G(l,t,{get:e[t],enumerable:!0})},Pe=(l,e,t,n)=>{if(e&&typeof e=="object"||typeof e=="function")for(let r of Oe(e))!we.call(l,r)&&r!==t&&G(l,r,{get:()=>e[r],enumerable:!(n=Te(e,r))||n.enumerable});return...

      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe because propertyNames contains only non-null elements.
       *
       * Accordingly, we have it annotated as returning `Enumeration<? extends Object>` in our
       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two

      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe because propertyNames contains only non-null elements.
       *
       * Accordingly, we have it annotated as returning `Enumeration<? extends Object>` in our
       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two