}
					}
				}
			}
		}
		prs := peerResults[local]
		if prs.Err == "" {
			if err = commitBinary(); err != nil {
				prs.Err = err.Error()
			}
			peerResults[local] = prs
		}
	}

	prs, ok := peerResults[local]
	if ok {
		prs.WaitingDrives = waitingDrivesNode()
		peerResults[local] = prs
	}

	if globalIsDistErasure {

/// info | Información

Desafortunadamente, no puedo simplemente confiar en PRs que solo tienen varias aprobaciones.

Varias veces ha sucedido que hay PRs con 3, 5 o más aprobaciones, probablemente porque la descripción es atractiva, pero cuando reviso los PRs, en realidad están rotos, tienen un bug, o no resuelven el problema que dicen resolver. 😅

on:
  push:
  pull_request_target:
    types: [synchronize]

jobs:
  main:
    permissions:
      contents: read
      pull-requests: write
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Check if PRs have merge conflicts
        uses: eps1lon/actions-label-merge-conflict@v3
        with:
          dirtyLabel: "conflicts"
          repoToken: "${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}"

/// info

Leider kann ich PRs, nur weil sie von Mehreren gutgeheißen wurden, nicht einfach vertrauen.

Es ist mehrmals passiert, dass es PRs mit drei, fünf oder mehr Zustimmungen gibt, wahrscheinlich weil die Beschreibung ansprechend ist, aber wenn ich die PRs überprüfe, sind sie tatsächlich fehlerhaft, haben einen Bug, oder lösen das Problem nicht, welches sie behaupten, zu lösen. 😅

/// info

Unfortunately, I can't simply trust PRs that just have several approvals.

Several times it has happened that there are PRs with 3, 5 or more approvals, probably because the description is appealing, but when I check the PRs, they are actually broken, have a bug, or don't solve the problem they claim to solve. 😅

What’s changing now:

* 🚫 We’re no longer accepting new community-submitted translation PRs.

* ⏳ Existing open PRs will be reviewed and can still be merged if completed within the next 3 weeks (since July 11 2025).

* 👥 Update FastAPI People - Experts. PR [#14034](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/14034) by [@tiangolo](https://github.com/tiangolo).
* 👷 Detect and label merge conflicts on PRs automatically. PR [#14045](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/14045) by [@svlandeg](https://github.com/svlandeg).

        [keras-team/keras](http://github.com/keras-team/keras). The API
        endpoints for `tf.keras` stay unchanged, but are now backed by the
        `keras` PIP package. All Keras-related PRs and issues should now be
        directed to the GitHub repository.
        [keras-team/keras](http://github.com/keras-team/keras).
    *   `tf.keras.utils.experimental.DatasetCreator` now takes an optional