}
        } else if (since instanceof SinceTagStatus.Inconsistent inconsistent) {
            return acceptOrReject(member, Violation.error(member, String.format(SINCE_INCONSISTENT_ERROR_MESSAGE, inconsistent.getVersions())));
        } else if (since instanceof SinceTagStatus.NotNeeded) {
            return null;

    assertEquals(Country.class, bimap.valueType());
  }

  public void testIterationOrder() {
    // The enum orderings are alphabetical, leading to the bimap and its inverse
    // having inconsistent iteration orderings.
    Map<Currency, Country> map =
        ImmutableMap.of(
            Currency.DOLLAR, Country.CANADA,
            Currency.PESO, Country.CHILE,
            Currency.FRANC, Country.SWITZERLAND);

* **Inconsistent API surface**: Public APIs with mixed spelling conventions appear less professional and polished
* **Harder for non-native speakers**: Contributors and users for whom English is a second language benefit from a single, consistent convention

   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at
   * {@link Predicate#apply}. Do not provide a predicate such as {@code
   * Predicates.instanceOf(ArrayList.class)}, which is inconsistent with equals.
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object> Map<K, V> filterKeys(

Keep in mind that when using `Query` inside of `Annotated` you cannot use the `default` parameter for `Query`.

Instead, use the actual default value of the function parameter. Otherwise, it would be inconsistent.

For example, this is not allowed:

```Python
q: Annotated[str, Query(default="rick")] = "morty"
```

...because it's not clear if the default value should be `"rick"` or `"morty"`.

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [(short) 1] < [(short) 1, (short) 2] < [(short) 2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(short[],
   * short[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<short[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [(short) 1] < [(short) 1, (short) 2] < [(short) 2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(short[],
   * short[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<short[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [1.0f] < [1.0f, 2.0f] < [2.0f]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(float[],
   * float[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<float[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [1.0] < [1.0, 2.0] < [2.0]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(double[],
   * double[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<double[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<int[]> lexicographicalComparator() {