}

    // Demonstrates observed equals() asymmetry when this is shorter than argument
    @Test
    @DisplayName("equals: this shorter but same prefix -> true (observed behavior)")
    void equals_thisShorterSamePrefix_true_dueToImplementation() {
        // Arrange: left shorter than right but with identical prefix

    }

    /**
     * Finish building an instance which also maps {@code x = x2} to {@code y = y2}. These values
     * must not both be identical to the values given in the first mapping. If only the {@code x}
     * values are identical, the transformation is vertical. If only the {@code y} values are
     * identical, the transformation is horizontal (i.e. the slope is zero).
     */
    public LinearTransformation and(double x2, double y2) {

   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.

   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.

    assertEquals("a", Strings.commonPrefix("abc", "aaaaa"));
    assertEquals("aa", Strings.commonPrefix("aa", "aaaaa"));
    assertEquals("abc", Strings.commonPrefix(new StringBuilder("abcdef"), "abcxyz"));

    // Identical valid surrogate pairs.
    assertEquals(
        "abc\uD8AB\uDCAB", Strings.commonPrefix("abc\uD8AB\uDCABdef", "abc\uD8AB\uDCABxyz"));
    // Differing valid surrogate pairs.

            assertArrayEquals(firstEncoding, secondEncoding, "First and second encoding should be identical");
            assertArrayEquals(secondEncoding, thirdEncoding, "Second and third encoding should be identical");

            // Verify content preservation
            assertArrayEquals(mechs, parsed2.getMechanisms());
            assertEquals(flags, parsed2.getContextFlags());

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Set;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Variant of {@link SerializableTester} that does not require the reserialized object's class to be
 * identical to the original.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
/*
 * The whole thing is really @GwtIncompatible, but GwtJUnitConvertedTestModule doesn't have a

  // defaults

  /**
   * Copies all characters between the {@link Reader} and {@link StringBuilder} objects. Does not
   * close or flush the reader.
   *
   * <p>This is identical to {@link #copy(Readable, Appendable)} but optimized for these specific
   * types. CharBuffer has poor performance when being written into or read out of so round tripping

/// tip

## Overview

Replication relies on immutability provided by versioning to sync objects between the configured source and replication target. Replication results in the object data, metadata, last modification time and version ID all being identical between the source and target. Thus version ordering is automatically guaranteed on the source and target clusters.

### Replication of object version and metadata