assertTrue(crawlerEngineClient instanceof org.codelibs.fess.crawler.client.FesenClient);
    }

    // Test multiple instances
    public void test_multipleInstances() {
        // Test that multiple instances can be created independently
        CrawlerEngineClient client1 = new CrawlerEngineClient();
        CrawlerEngineClient client2 = new CrawlerEngineClient();

            logger.debug("Initialize {}", this.getClass().getSimpleName());
        }
        load();
    }

    /**
     * Returns a list of available KeyMatch instances.
     *
     * @return A list of KeyMatch instances.
     */
    public List<KeyMatch> getAvailableKeyMatchList() {
        return ComponentUtil.getComponent(KeyMatchBhv.class).selectList(cb -> {
            cb.query().matchAll();

import org.w3c.dom.Document;
import org.w3c.dom.NamedNodeMap;
import org.w3c.dom.Node;
import org.w3c.dom.NodeList;

/**
 * Factory class responsible for managing and providing access to data store instances.
 * This factory maintains a registry of data store implementations and provides methods
 * to register, retrieve, and discover available data stores.
 *

   * future is {@linkplain Future#isDone() done}.
   *
   * <p>Prefer to create {@code ListenableFuture} instances with {@link SettableFuture}, {@link
   * MoreExecutors#listeningDecorator( java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService)}, {@link
   * ListenableFutureTask}, {@link AbstractFuture}, and other utilities over creating plain {@code
   * Future} instances to be upgraded to {@code ListenableFuture} after the fact.
   */

        FessUserNotFoundException exception1 = new FessUserNotFoundException("user1");
        FessUserNotFoundException exception2 = new FessUserNotFoundException("user2");

        // Both instances should be of the same class
        assertEquals(exception1.getClass(), exception2.getClass());
    }

    public void test_stackTrace() {
        // Test that the exception has a proper stack trace

        assertTrue(result.contains(expectedHashCode));
    }

    // Test toString() format consistency
    public void test_toString_formatConsistency() {
        // Create multiple instances and verify consistent format
        FessUserTimeZoneProcessProvider provider1 = new FessUserTimeZoneProcessProvider();
        FessUserTimeZoneProcessProvider provider2 = new FessUserTimeZoneProcessProvider();

    protected static final String KRYO = "kryo";

    /** ThreadLocal container for Kryo instances to ensure thread safety. */
    protected final ThreadLocal<Kryo> kryoThreadLocal;

    /**
     * Constructs a new DataSerializer.
     * <p>
     * Initializes the ThreadLocal Kryo instances with appropriate configuration.
     * The Kryo instances are configured to not require class registration for

    }

    public void test_instanceCreation() {
        // Test that multiple instances can be created independently
        FessJsonResourceProvider provider1 = new FessJsonResourceProvider();
        FessJsonResourceProvider provider2 = new FessJsonResourceProvider();

        assertNotSame(provider1, provider2);

        // Both instances should have the same behavior

   * may be false for some instances where the statistics are mathematically equal, including
   * instances constructed from the same values in a different order... or (in the general case)
   * even in the same order. (It is guaranteed to return true for instances constructed from the
   * same values in the same order if {@code strictfp} is in effect, or if the system architecture

   * TODO(kevinb): evaluate the trade-offs of going bimorphic to save these two fields from most
   * instances. Note that the instances that would get smaller are the right set to care about
   * optimizing, because the rest have the option of calling `trimmed`.
   */

  private final transient int start; // it happens that we only serialize instances where this is 0
  private final int end; // exclusive