based on a specific branch. Currently, we have two pipelines: `master` and `release`, but you can easily create
and test another isolated pipeline from any branch. 

We'll explain everything via an example. Let's say you make some changes on your branch `myTestBranch`
(we highly recommend to name this branch without prefix and hyphen (`-`) because it's used to generate build type ID) and want to

automations:

  # Also post a comment that lists the best experts for the files that were modified.
  comment_experts:
    if:
      - {{ ('code_experts' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
    run:
      - action: explain-code-experts@v1
        args:

* To provide best practices and solutions we (as the *build tool* team) want to promote.
* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.
* To explain *rejected solutions*, for now, and future development, in case they are proposed again.

ADRs can be written by any team.
Like code, they should be reviewed by any other relevant teams.

			defaultStmt := &gorm.Statement{Vars: []interface{}{field.DefaultValueInterface}}
			m.Dialector.BindVarTo(defaultStmt, defaultStmt, field.DefaultValueInterface)
			expr.SQL += " DEFAULT " + m.Dialector.Explain(defaultStmt.SQL.String(), field.DefaultValueInterface)
		} else if field.DefaultValue != "(-)" {
			expr.SQL += " DEFAULT " + field.DefaultValue
		}
	}

	return
}

			sql, vars := stmt.SQL.String(), stmt.Vars
			if filter, ok := db.Logger.(ParamsFilter); ok {
				sql, vars = filter.ParamsFilter(stmt.Context, stmt.SQL.String(), stmt.Vars...)
			}
			return db.Dialector.Explain(sql, vars...), db.RowsAffected
		}, db.Error)
	}

	if !stmt.DB.DryRun {
		stmt.SQL.Reset()
		stmt.Vars = nil
	}

	if resetBuildClauses {
		stmt.BuildClauses = nil
	}

	return db

		},
	}

	for idx, r := range results {
		if result := logger.ExplainSQL(r.SQL, r.NumericRegexp, `"`, r.Vars...); result != r.Result {
			t.Errorf("Explain SQL #%v expects %v, but got %v", idx, r.Result, result)
		}
	}

  // plugin once it lands on a node. This data is returned by the driver
  // after a successful allocation and is opaque to Kubernetes. Driver
  // documentation may explain to users how to interpret this data if needed.
  //
  // Setting this field is optional. It has a maximum size of 32 entries.
  // If null (or empty), it is assumed this allocation will be processed by a

1. Open the failure report mentioned in the output.\
If you don't see the report link in the output in the IDE, make sure to select the top-level node in the structured output panel.
The report will explain the errors in detail.
Perhaps, you forgot to add an `@Incubating` annotation or `@since` in the javadoc.

2. Accept the changes.\
If you are sure that the changes are intentional, follow the steps described in the report.

**This release upgrades OkHttp to Kotlin.** We tried our best to make fast and safe to upgrade
from OkHttp 3.x. We wrote an [upgrade guide][upgrading_to_okhttp_4] to help with the migration and a
[blog post][okhttp4_blog_post] to explain it.

 *  Fix: Target Java 8 bytecode for Java and Kotlin.


## Version 4.0.0-RC3

_2019-06-24_

 *  Fix: Retain binary-compatibility in `okhttp3.internal.HttpMethod`. Naughty third party SDKs

	stmt := dryDB.Clauses(clause.OrderBy{
		Expression: clause.Expr{SQL: "FIELD(id,?)", Vars: []interface{}{[]int{1, 2, 3}}, WithoutParentheses: true},
	}).Find(&User{}).Statement

	explainedSQL := dryDB.Dialector.Explain(stmt.SQL.String(), stmt.Vars...)
	if !regexp.MustCompile("SELECT \\* FROM .*users.* ORDER BY FIELD\\(id,1,2,3\\)").MatchString(explainedSQL) {
		t.Fatalf("Build Order condition, but got %v", explainedSQL)
	}
}