*
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations

	if c.Empty() {
		return
	}

	// Now overlay existing object replication choices for target
	if oi.DeleteMarker {
		opts := replication.ObjectOpts{
			Name:           oi.Name,
			DeleteMarker:   oi.DeleteMarker,
			VersionID:      oi.VersionID,

     * For example, an artifact of type {@value org.apache.maven.api.Type#JAR} can be placed
     * either on the class-path or on the module-path. The project needs to make a choice
     * (possibly using heuristic rules), then to add the dependency in only one of the options
     * identified by {@link PathType}.
     *
     * @return file paths to place on the different tool options
     */

   * making this call. If it is not sorted, the results are undefined.
   *
   * <p>If there are elements in the list which compare as equal to the key, the choice of {@link
   * KeyPresentBehavior} decides which index is returned. If no elements compare as equal to the
   * key, the choice of {@link KeyAbsentBehavior} decides which index is returned.
   *
   * <p>This method runs in log(n) time on random-access lists, which offer near-constant-time

   * making this call. If it is not sorted, the results are undefined.
   *
   * <p>If there are elements in the list which compare as equal to the key, the choice of {@link
   * KeyPresentBehavior} decides which index is returned. If no elements compare as equal to the
   * key, the choice of {@link KeyAbsentBehavior} decides which index is returned.
   *
   * <p>This method runs in log(n) time on random-access lists, which offer near-constant-time

 documentation for details on file names, formats, and so on.

 During Maven initialization, Maven tweaks default root logging level to match CLI verbosity choice. Since such feature isn't available
 in SLF4J API, logging implementation specific extensions need to be added into Maven to support these CLI options: see

# Templates

You can use any template engine you want with **FastAPI**.

A common choice is Jinja2, the same one used by Flask and other tools.

There are utilities to configure it easily that you can use directly in your **FastAPI** application (provided by Starlette).

## Install dependencies

Make sure you create a [virtual environment](../virtual-environments.md){.internal-link target=_blank}, activate it, and install `jinja2`:

<div class="termy">

  public abstract boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object object);

  /**
   * Returns a hash code for this instance.
   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific choice of
   * hash code unspecified, unlike the Java 8+ equivalent.
   */
  @Override
  public abstract int hashCode();

  /**
   * Returns a string representation for this instance.
   *

Then, when it's your turn, you do actual "productive" work, you process the menu, decide what you want, get your crush's choice, pay, check that you give the correct bill or card, check that you are charged correctly, check that the order has the correct items, etc.

	endpointStrings []string

	// Total number of sets and the number of disks per set.
	setCount, setDriveCount int
	defaultParityCount      int

	poolIndex int

	// Distribution algorithm of choice.
	distributionAlgo string
	deploymentID     [16]byte

	lastConnectDisksOpTime time.Time
}

var staleUploadsCleanupIntervalChangedCh = make(chan struct{})