}

    // Test field assignment
    public void test_fieldAssignment() {
        String[] fields = new String[] { "field1", "field2", "field3" };
        facetInfo.field = fields;
        assertNotNull(facetInfo.field);
        assertEquals(3, facetInfo.field.length);
        assertSame(fields, facetInfo.field);
    }

    // Test size assignment
    public void test_sizeAssignment() {

								if field.AutoUpdateTime > 0 {
									assignment := clause.Assignment{Column: clause.Column{Name: field.DBName}, Value: curTime}
									switch field.AutoUpdateTime {
									case schema.UnixNanosecond:
										assignment.Value = curTime.UnixNano()
									case schema.UnixMillisecond:
										assignment.Value = curTime.UnixMilli()
									case schema.UnixSecond:
										assignment.Value = curTime.Unix()
									}

        // Direct field assignment
        item.id = 999L;

        // Verify through getter
        assertEquals(999L, item.getId());

        // Verify direct field access
        assertEquals(999L, item.id);
    }

    public void test_sequentialIdAssignment() {
        // Test sequential ID assignment pattern
        TestDictionaryItem[] items = new TestDictionaryItem[5];

/**
 * API action for admin document management.
 * Provides RESTful API endpoints for bulk document operations in the Fess search engine.
 * Supports indexing multiple documents with automatic field validation and default value assignment.
 */
public class ApiAdminDocumentsAction extends FessApiAdminAction {

    // ===================================================================================
    // Constant
    //

        assertFalse("Thread should not be started yet", thread.isAlive());
    }

    public void test_processAssignment() throws IOException {
        Process mockProcess = createMockProcess("assignment test");
        JobProcess jobProcess = new JobProcess(mockProcess);

        Process assignedProcess = jobProcess.getProcess();

If it was in a type annotation we could have used the vertical bar, as:

```Python
some_variable: PlaneItem | CarItem
```

But if we put that in the assignment `response_model=PlaneItem | CarItem` we would get an error, because Python would try to perform an **invalid operation** between `PlaneItem` and `CarItem` instead of interpreting that as a type annotation.

          () -> {
            lock.lock();
            try {
              startUp();
              /*
               * requireNonNull is safe because executorService is never cleared after the
               * assignment above.
               */
              requireNonNull(executorService);
              runningTask = scheduler().schedule(delegate, executorService, task);
              notifyStarted();

   * Guides the allowed concurrency among update operations. Used as a hint for internal sizing. The
   * table is internally partitioned to try to permit the indicated number of concurrent updates
   * without contention. Because assignment of entries to these partitions is not necessarily
   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to

          () -> {
            lock.lock();
            try {
              startUp();
              /*
               * requireNonNull is safe because executorService is never cleared after the
               * assignment above.
               */
              requireNonNull(executorService);
              runningTask = scheduler().schedule(delegate, executorService, task);
              notifyStarted();

	}

	// Remove the policy assignment on the user DN:

	if _, err = s.adm.DetachPolicyLDAP(ctx, userReq); err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("Unable to detach user policy: %v", err)
	}

	_, err = ldapID.Retrieve()
	if err == nil {
		c.Fatalf("Expected to fail to create a user with no associated policy!")
	}

	// Set policy via group and validate policy assignment.