Podrías tener turnos como en el ejemplo de las hamburguesas, primero la sala de estar, luego la cocina, pero como no estás esperando 🕙 nada, solo limpiando y limpiando, los turnos no afectarían nada.

Tomaría la misma cantidad de tiempo terminar con o sin turnos (concurrencia) y habrías hecho la misma cantidad de trabajo.

Você poderia ter turnos como no exemplo dos hambúrgueres, primeiro a sala de estar, então a cozinha, mas como você não está esperando por nada, apenas limpando e limpando, as chamadas não afetariam em nada.

Levaria o mesmo tempo para finalizar com ou sem turnos (concorrência) e você teria feito o mesmo tanto de trabalho.

E o sistema de contêiner com o **balanceador de carga** iria **distribuir as solicitações** para cada um dos contêineres com seu aplicativo **em turnos**. Portanto, cada solicitação poderia ser tratada por um dos múltiplos **contêineres replicados** executando seu aplicativo.

Y el sistema de contenedores distribuido con el **load balancer** **distribuiría las requests** a cada uno de los contenedores con tu aplicación **en turnos**. Así, cada request podría ser manejada por uno de los múltiples **contenedores replicados** ejecutando tu aplicación.

There's no waiting 🕙 anywhere, just a lot of work to be done, on multiple places of the house.

You could have turns as in the burgers example, first the living room, then the kitchen, but as you are not waiting 🕙 for anything, just cleaning and cleaning, the turns wouldn't affect anything.

It would take the same amount of time to finish with or without turns (concurrency) and you would have done the same amount of work.

    this.target = checkNotNull(target);
  }

  /*
   * Abstract methods from Writer
   */

  @Override
  public void write(char[] cbuf, int off, int len) throws IOException {
    checkNotClosed();
    // It turns out that creating a new String is usually as fast, or faster
    // than wrapping cbuf in a light-weight CharSequence.
    target.append(new String(cbuf, off, len));
  }

  /*

 * CharEscaper based on the generated array.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 15.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public final class CharEscaperBuilder {
  /**
   * Simple decorator that turns an array of replacement char[]s into a CharEscaper, this results in
   * a very fast escape method.
   */
  private static final class CharArrayDecorator extends CharEscaper {
    private final char[] @Nullable [] replacements;

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,