nt .nav-treeview .nav-treeview{border-left:.2rem solid}.nav-flat.nav-child-indent .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-icon{margin-left:1.15rem}.nav-flat.nav-child-indent .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-icon{margin-left:1.45rem}.nav-flat.nav-child-indent .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-icon{margin-left:1.75rem}.nav-flat.nav-child-indent .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-icon{margin-left:2.05rem}.sidebar-collapse .na...

.nav-flat.nav-sidebar.nav-child-indent .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-icon,\n.sidebar-mini .main-sidebar.sidebar-focused .nav-flat.nav-sidebar.nav-child-indent .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-icon,\n.sidebar-mini-md .main-sidebar.sidebar-focused .nav-flat.nav-sidebar.nav-child-indent .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-treeview .nav-icon,\n.sidebar-mini-xs .main-sidebar.sidebar-focused .nav-fla...

dget="todo-list"]'))})),n.default.fn[Qt]=Lt._jQueryInterface,n.default.fn[Qt].Constructor=Lt,n.default.fn[Qt].noConflict=function(){return n.default.fn[Qt]=zt,Lt._jQueryInterface};var Dt="Treeview",Rt="lte.treeview",At=n.default.fn[Dt],Mt=".nav-item",qt=".nav-treeview",Ot=".menu-open",Nt='[data-widget="treeview"]',Pt="menu-open",Ut="menu-is-opening",Bt={trigger:Nt+" .nav-link",animationSpeed:300,accordion:!0,expandSidebar:!1,sidebarButtonSelector:'[data-widget="pushmenu"]'},$t=function(){function...

====================================================\n */\n\n$.fn[NAME] = Treeview._jQueryInterface\n$.fn[NAME].Constructor = Treeview\n$.fn[NAME].noConflict = function () {\n  $.fn[NAME] = JQUERY_NO_CONFLICT\n  return Treeview._jQueryInterface\n}\n\nexport default Treeview\n"]}...

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

   * the first are ignored.
   */
  public static <E> ImmutableSet<E> of(E e1, E e2) {
    return new RegularSetBuilderImpl<E>(2).add(e1).add(e2).review().build();
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable set containing the given elements, minus duplicates, in the order each was

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If the feature has merit, it will go through a thorough process of API design
and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues

Pull requests
-------------

   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */
  static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(T[] reference, int length) {

   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */
  static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(T[] reference, int length) {